1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Simora [160]
3 years ago
12

If you have 9.3×1026 molecules of iron that rusts, how many molecules of oxygen does it take?

Chemistry
1 answer:
maks197457 [2]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:1.395x10^27 molecules of O2

Explanation:

2Fe + 3/2O2 —> Fe2O3

for every 2 atoms of Fe, 1.5 molecules of O2 —> 1.395x10^27

You might be interested in
Is 2 KNO₃ + H₂CO₃ → K₂CO₃ + 4 HNO₃ a balanced equation
krok68 [10]

Hey there!

The elements in this equation are K, N, O, H, and C.

Let's count how many of each are on each side to see if it is balanced.

K: 2 on the left, 2 on the right.

<em>N: 2 on the left, 4 on the right. </em>

<em>O: 9 on the left, 6 on the right. </em>

<em>H: 2 on the left, 4 on the right. </em>

C: 1 on the left, 1 on the right.

Notice that there are different amounts of N, O, and H on the left side and the right side.

This means that the equation is not balanced.

Hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Pu is a nuclear waste byproduct with a half-life of 24,000 y. What fraction of the 239Pu present today will be present in 1000 y
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer:

0.9715 Fraction of Pu-239 will be remain after 1000 years.

Explanation:

\lambda =\frac{0.693}{t_{\frac{1}{2}}}

A=A_o\times e^{-\lambda t}

Where:

\lambda= decay constant

A_o =concentration left after time t

t_{\frac{1}{2}} = Half life of the sample

Half life of Pu-239 = t_{\frac{1}{2}}=24,000 y[

\lambda =\frac{0.693}{24,000 y}=2.8875\times 10^{-5} y^{-1]

Let us say amount present of  Pu-239 today = A_o=x

A = ?

A=x\times e^{-2.8875\times 10^{-5} y^{-1]\times 1000 y}

A=0.9715\times x

\frac{A}{A_0}=\frac{A}{x}=0.9715

0.9715 Fraction of Pu-239 will be remain after 1000 years.

7 0
3 years ago
After he conducted cathode ray tube experiments proving the existence of negatively charged particles we now call electrons, Tho
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

Answer is explained below;

Explanation:

In 1904, after the discovery of the electron, the English physicist Sir J.J. Thomson proposed the plum pudding model of an atom. In this model, the atom had a positively-charged space with negatively charged electrons embedded inside it i.e., like a pudding (positively charged space) with plums (electrons) inside.

In 1911, another physicist Ernest Rutherford proposed another model known as the Rutherford model or planetary model of the atom that describes the structure of atoms. In this model, the small and dense atom has a positively charged core called the nucleus. Also, he proposed that just like the planets revolving around the Sun, the negatively charged electrons are moving around the nucleus.

By conducting a gold foil experiment, Rutherford disproved Thomson's model. In this experiment, positively charged alpha particles emitted from a radioactive source enclosed within a protective lead were used which was then focused into a narrow beam. It was then passed through a slit in front of which a thin section of gold foil was placed. A fluorescent screen (coated with zinc sulfide) was also placed in front of the slit to detect alpha particles which on striking the fluorescent screen would produce scintillation (a burst of light) which was visible through a microscope attached to the back of the screen.

He observed that most of the alpha particles passed straight through the gold foil without any resistance and this implied that atoms contain a large amount of open space. The slight deflection of some of the alpha particles, the large-angle scattering of other alpha particles and even the bouncing back of a very few alpha particles toward the source suggested their interactions with other positively charged particles inside the atom.

So, he concluded that only a dense and positively charged particle such as the nucleus would be responsible for such strong repulsion. Also, the negatively charged electrons electrically balanced the positive nuclear charge and they moved around the nucleus in circular orbits. Between the electrons and nucleus, there was an electrostatic force of attraction just like the gravitational force of attraction between the sun and the revolving planets.

Later, the Rutherford model was replaced by the Bohr atomic model.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is possible for aluminum to have a full outer shell?
lesya [120]
B. Three are lost creating Al+3. Because atoms have and equal amount of Protons and Electons when neutral losing 3 electrons will create a positive Al ion Al+3
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The activation energy for a reaction is changed from 184 kJ/mol to 59.0 kJ/mol at 600. K by the introduction of a catalyst. If t
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

The catalyzed reaction will take 2.85 seconds to occur.

Explanation:

The activation energy of a reaction is given by:                                                        

k = Ae^{-\frac{E_{a}}{RT}}

For the reaction without catalyst we have:

k_{1} = Ae^{-\frac{E_{a_{1}}}{RT}}   (1)

And for the reaction with the catalyst:

k_{2} = Ae^{-\frac{E_{a_{2}}}{RT}}   (2)

Assuming that frequency factor (A) and the temperature (T) are constant, by dividing equation (1) with equation (2) we have:                      

\frac{k_{1}}{k_{2}} = \frac{Ae^{-\frac{E_{a_{1}}}{RT}}}{Ae^{-\frac{E_{a_{2}}}{RT}}}

\frac{k_{1}}{k_{2}} = e^{\frac{E_{a_{2}} - E_{a_{1}}}{RT}    

\frac{k_{1}}{k_{2}} = e^{\frac{59.0 \cdot 10^{3}J/mol - 184 \cdot 10^{3} J/mol}{8.314 J/Kmol*600 K} = 1.31 \cdot 10^{-11}    

Since the reaction rate is related to the time as follow:

k = \frac{\Delta [R]}{t}

And assuming that the initial concentrations ([R]) are the same, we have:

\frac{k_{1}}{k_{2}} = \frac{\Delta [R]/t_{1}}{\Delta [R]/t_{2}}

\frac{k_{1}}{k_{2}} = \frac{t_{2}}{t_{1}}

t_{2} = t_{1}\frac{k_{1}}{k_{2}} = 6900 y*1.31 \cdot 10^{-11} = 9.04 \cdot 10^{-8} y*\frac{365 d}{1 y}*\frac{24 h}{1 d}*\frac{3600 s}{1 h} = 2.85 s

Therefore, the catalyzed reaction will take 2.85 seconds to occur.

I hope it helps you!                            

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are the optimum conditions for the Haber process a temperature of 450°C and pressure of 200 atmospheres?
    10·2 answers
  • How many milliliter are in 0.063 L
    14·2 answers
  • What is a scientific claim
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the Lewis structure for H3PO4?
    7·1 answer
  • Marcus measured the masses and volumes of samples of four different substances, and he calculated their densities. The table sho
    9·2 answers
  • In preparation for a demonstration, your professor brings a 1.50−L bottle of sulfur dioxide into the lecture hall before class t
    5·1 answer
  • How does the mass of a gas particle affect its rate of effusion?
    11·1 answer
  • The Law of Conservation of Matter states that in a chemical reaction matter cannot be ___ or ____
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER I GIVE BRAINLIEST AND MAX POINTS
    8·1 answer
  • In his explanation of the threshold frequency in the photoelectric effect, Einstein reasoned that the absorbed photon must have
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!