All categories

2 years ago

2) Does this mapping diagram represent a function? *

Mathematics

1 answer:

Paul [167]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

each input is put with only one output therefore it is a function

You might be interested in

If a temperature in degrees Celsius is given as C, finding the sum of 1.8 times C and 32 gives the temperature in degrees Fahren

Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

hsuvsjvBcsjfbdkchdkksfsnadeolataogzfdkgcjb

6 0

3 years ago

Y³+3x²y+3xy²+y³-3x²y what is the answer

bazaltina [42]

$y^{2}$ (2y + 3x)

7 0

3 years ago

What is the solution of a system definded by y=-x+5 and 5x+2y=14?

Digiron [165]

The answer to the question

3 0

3 years ago

Find c.

Anika [276]

Answer:

9.7cm

Step-by-step explanation

According to the sine rule;

a/sinA = c/sinC

8/sin55 = c/sin82

Cross multiply

csin55 = 8sin82

c(0.8192) = 8(0.9903)

c = 8(0.9903)/0.8192

c = 7.9221/0.8192

c = 9.67

Hence the value of c to the nearest tenth is 9.7cm

6 0

2 years ago

The U.S. Census Bureau conducts annual surveys to obtain information on the percentage of the voting-age population that is regi

yan [13]

Answer:

We conclude that the percentage of employed workers who have registered to vote exceeds the percentage of unemployed workers who have registered to vote.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that 513 employed persons and 604 unemployed persons are independently and randomly selected, and that 287 of the employed persons and 280 of the unemployed persons have registered to vote.

Let $p_1$ = percentage of employed workers who have registered to vote.

$p_2$ = percentage of unemployed workers who have registered to vote.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1\leq p_2$ {means that the percentage of employed workers who have registered to vote does not exceeds the percentage of unemployed workers who have registered to vote}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1>p_2$ {means that the percentage of employed workers who have registered to vote exceeds the percentage of unemployed workers who have registered to vote}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of employed workers who have registered to vote = $\frac{287}{513}$ = 0.56

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of unemployed workers who have registered to vote = $\frac{280}{604}$ = 0.46

$n_1$ = sample of employed persons = 513

$n_2$ = sample of unemployed persons = 604

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.56-0.46)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.56(1-0.56)}{513}+\frac{0.46(1-0.46)}{604} } }$

= 3.349

The value of z test statistics is 3.349.

Now, at 0.05 significance level the z table gives critical value of 1.645 for right-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is more than the critical value of z as 3.349 > 1.645, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the percentage of employed workers who have registered to vote exceeds the percentage of unemployed workers who have registered to vote.

5 0

2 years ago