1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vovikov84 [41]
3 years ago
8

Aiden and gia went to a clothing store where all the items had a 7% sales tax added to their cost. before the tax was added aide

n bought a shirt for $32 and gia bought a hat for $26. using the products find the amount of tax that:
a. aiden paid on his shirt
b. gia paid on her hat
Mathematics
2 answers:
pshichka [43]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a. $34.24

b. $33

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

Dahasolnce [82]3 years ago
3 0
Aiden’s Subtotal - $32
+ 7% = 0.07 x $32 = $2.24

$32 + 2.24 =
Aiden’s total - $34.24
_______________________________

Gia’s Subtotal - $26
+ 7% = 0.07 x $26 = $1.82

$26 + $1.82 =

Gia’s total - $27.82
You might be interested in
A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

                                                                            Predicted value

                           Active value                 Fraudulent       Non-fraudulent

                              Fraudlent                         30                       58

                          non-fraudulent                   32                     920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of \left( {b + c} \right)(b+c) and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, 30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040

The error rate is,

\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}  

The percentage is 0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and \left( {a + b} \right)(a+b) .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}  

The percentage is, 0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and \left( {c + d} \right)(c+d) .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}

The percentage is, 0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64

8 0
3 years ago
Help please I need it right now thanks
babunello [35]

Answer:

The number of data values between the lower quartile and the median is less than the number of data values between the upper quartile and the median.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
7+7 please help me i need help quick right away
IgorC [24]

Answer:

very funny and 14

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help! please show some sort of proof! thanks xo
Vadim26 [7]

Answer:

I think it is B I am sorry if wrong

5 0
3 years ago
(y + 2)(y^2 - 2y + 3)
Olegator [25]

Answer:

y^3 - y + 6

Step-by-step explanation:

I believe this is right

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If f(x) = square root of x+3, what is the equation for f–1(x)? f–1(x) = x2 - 3 f–1(x) = x2 + 3 f–1(x) = (x - 3) 2 f–1(x) = (x +
    8·1 answer
  • What is the property demonstrated by: (10+y)-16=10+(y-16)
    12·2 answers
  • This chart shows the cost per pound of different fruits.
    10·2 answers
  • Oliver has 3 times as many rocks in his collection as Katie. Then Oliver collected 75 more rocks and Katie collected 105 more ro
    7·2 answers
  • Rebecca was hungry so she decided to stop and get something to eat she bought a cheeseburger for $2.73, french fries for $1.58 a
    13·1 answer
  • I need the volume of these two, please give me a quick answer. I don't have much time​
    6·2 answers
  • Is it <br> A.<br> B.<br> C.<br> D.<br> I really need help .
    11·1 answer
  • Evaluate. 5! - 4! = [1] <br><br> May any math experts please help thank you
    5·1 answer
  • Please help im struggling​
    9·1 answer
  • For an integer n ≥ 0, show that (n/2) - (-n/2) = n.<br><br> Use greatest integer function
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!