1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna11 [10]
3 years ago
6

What is the advantage in solving motion problems using energy conservation principles instead of free body diagrams

Physics
1 answer:
riadik2000 [5.3K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

However, the disadvantages are:

1. Many atimes for some motion prolems, free-body diagrams has to be drawn many times so to have enough equations to solve for the unknowns. This is not the same with energy conservation principles.

2. In situations where we need to find the internal forces acting on an object, we can't truly solve such problems using free-body diagram as it captures external forces. This is not the same with energy conservation principles.

Explanation:

Often times the ideal method to use in solving motion problem related questions are mostly debated.

Energy conservation principles applies to isolated systems are useful when object changes their positions in moving upward or downward converts its potential energy due to gravity for kinetic energy, or the other way round. When energy in a system or motion remains constant that is energy is neither created nor destroyed, it can therefore be easier to calculate other unknown paramters like in the motion problem velocity, distance bearing it in mind that energy can only change from one type to another.

On the other hand, free body diagram which is a visual representation of all the forces acting on an object including their directions has so many advantages in solving motion related problems which include finding relationship between force and motion in identifying the force acting on a body.

You might be interested in
two boxes sit on a frictionless surface and are in contact with one another. the first box has a mass of 7 kg and the second box
egoroff_w [7]
The acceleration of the boxes depends on the mass and weight. 

we have a mass of 7 and 8 kilograms

if it took 25 N force to move box A, then you would take 25 and multiply by 8 then divide by 2. 

It will leave you with 100 N. 

finally take the sq rt of 100 to get 10
7 0
3 years ago
Firecrackers A and B are 600 m apart. You are standing exactly halfway between them. Your lab partner is 300 m on the other side
pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

See the explanation

Explanation:

Given:

Distance of Firecrackers A and B = 600 m

Event 1 = firecracker 1 explodes

Event 2 = firecracker 2 explodes

Distance of lab partner from cracker A = 300 m

You observe the explosions at the same time

to find:

does event 1 occur before, after, or at the same time as event 2?

Solution:

Since the lab partner is at 300 m distance from the firecracker A and Firecrackers A and B are 600 m apart

So the distance of fire cracker B from the lab partner is:

600 m  + 300 m = 900 m

It takes longer for the light from the more distant firecracker to reach so

Let T1 represents the time taken for light from firecracker A to reach lab partner

T1 = 300/c

It is 300 because lab partner is 300 m on other side of firecracker A

Let T2 represents the time taken for light from firecracker B to reach lab partner

T2 = 900/c

It is 900 because lab partner is 900 m on other side of firecracker B

T2 = T1

900 = 300

900 = 3(300)

T2 = 3(T1)

Hence lab partner observes the explosion of the firecracker A before the explosion of firecracker B.

Since event 1 = firecracker 1 explodes and event 2 = firecracker 2 explodes

So this concludes that lab partner sees event 1 occur first and lab partner is smart enough to correct for the travel time of light and conclude that the events occur at the same time.

8 0
3 years ago
Question 15 of 25
vichka [17]
Answer: conduction :it transfers heat between objects that are in direct contact with eachother
7 0
2 years ago
How much energy is required to move an electron through a potential difference of
Tresset [83]
I think it’s going to be the 2nd one
3 0
3 years ago
The train slows down at the railroad crossing. Is that acceleration, velocity, speed, of none of the above?​
Vlad [161]

Answer:

none of the above

Explanation:

im pretty positive this is the answer tell me if i am wrong please

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If 125 j of heat energy is applied to a block of silver weighing 29.3 g, by how many degrees will the tem- perature of the silve
    5·1 answer
  • The continental crust is thicker than the oceanic crust. However, the oceanic crust is than the continental crust. Also, the oce
    6·1 answer
  • What is the station's orbital speed? the radius of earth is 6.37×106m, its mass is 5.98×1024kg.
    12·2 answers
  • What is SI unit electric current ?​
    7·1 answer
  • Why can’t we see the molecules moving in a solid or liquid?
    8·2 answers
  • Are stairs a type of inclined plane?
    11·2 answers
  • Please help will mark Brainliest the
    14·1 answer
  • Why is there more potential for wind energy in the upper himalayan in nepal?​
    12·1 answer
  • What is number 10 for this?
    12·1 answer
  • 15 PNTS
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!