Answer:
Max shear = 8.15 x 10^7 N/m2
Explanation:
In order to find the maximum stress for a solid shaft having radius r, we will be applying the Torsion formula which can be written as;
Allowable Shear Stress = Torque x Radius / pi/2 x radius^4
Putting the values we have;
T = 2000 N/m
Radius = Diameter/2 = 0.05 / 2 = 0.025 m
Putting values in formula;
Max shear = 2000 x 0.025 / 3.14/2 x (0.025)^4
Max shear = 8.15 x 10^7 N/m2
Answer:
W = 112 lb
Explanation:
Given:
- δb = 0.025 in
- E = 29000 ksi (A-36)
- Area A_de = 0.002 in^2
Find:
Compute Weight W attached at C
Solution:
- Use proportion to determine δd:
δd/5 = δb/3
δd = (5/3) * 0.025
δd = 0.0417 in
- Compute εde i.e strain in DE:
εde = δd / Lde
εde = 0.0417 / 3*12
εde = 0.00116
- Compute stress in DE, σde:
σde = E*εde
σde = 29000*0.00116
σde = 33.56 ksi
- Compute the Force F_de:
F_de = σde *A_de
F_de = 33.56*0.002
F_de = 0.0672 kips
- Equilibrium conditions apply:
(M)_a = 0
3*W - 5*F_de = 0
W = (5/3)*F_de
W = (5/3)* 0.0672 = 112 lb
Answer:
(a) The mean time to fail is 9491.22 hours
The standard deviation time to fail is 9491.22 hours
(b) 0.5905
(c) 3.915 × 10⁻¹²
(d) 2.63 × 10⁻⁵
Explanation:
(a) We put time to fail = t
∴ For an exponential distribution, we have f(t) = 
Where we have a failure rate = 10% for 1000 hours, we have(based on online resource);

e^(1000·λ) - 0.1·e^(1000·λ) = 1
0.9·e^(1000·λ) = 1
1000·λ = ㏑(1/0.9)
λ = 1.054 × 10⁻⁴
Hence the mean time to fail, E = 1/λ = 1/(1.054 × 10⁻⁴) = 9491.22 hours
The standard deviation = √(1/λ)² = √(1/(1.054 × 10⁻⁴)²)) = 9491.22 hours
b) Here we have to integrate from 5000 to ∞ as follows;
![p(t>5000) = \int\limits^{\infty}_{5000} {\lambda e^{-\lambda t}} \, dt =\left [ -e^{\lambda t}\right ]_{5000}^{\infty} = e^{5000 \lambda} = 0.5905](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p%28t%3E5000%29%20%3D%20%5Cint%5Climits%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D_%7B5000%7D%20%7B%5Clambda%20e%5E%7B-%5Clambda%20t%7D%7D%20%5C%2C%20dt%20%3D%5Cleft%20%5B%20%20-e%5E%7B%5Clambda%20t%7D%5Cright%20%5D_%7B5000%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%20%3D%20e%5E%7B5000%20%5Clambda%7D%20%3D%200.5905)
(c) The Poisson distribution is presented as follows;

p(x = 3) = 3.915 × 10⁻¹²
d) Where at least 2 components fail in one half hour, then 1 component is expected to fail in 15 minutes or 1/4 hours
The Cumulative Distribution Function is given as follows;
p( t ≤ 1/4)
.
Answer:
The fundamental difference between effective and less effective matrix organizations is whether the tension between different perspectives is creative or destructive. While various processes, systems and tools can help, what matters most is what top leadership says and does and how that flows through the organization in shared targets, clear accountabilities, live team interactions and team-building transparency and behaviors.
Getting matrix management right is linked inextricably to an organization’s culture - the only sustainable competitive advantage. Key components of a culture can be grouped into behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values and the environment.
Environment and values: Each organization has its own environment, context and bedrock values. Everyone needs to know what matters and why. Don’t try to do anything else until you’ve got that set.
Attitude is about choices: An organization’s overall strategy drives choices about which of its parts will be best in class (superior), world class (parity), strong (above average), or simplified/outsourced to be good enough. These choices help determine the need for a matrix and how best to design it.
Relationships and behaviors: This is why organizations have matrices. The most effective of them best balance focus and collaboration. They allow leaders and teams to build differential strengths and then work together to make the best possible decisions and scale enterprises with a creative tension that they could not do on their own.
My colleague Joe Durrett has worked all sides of matrix organizations in marketing at Procter & Gamble, sales and general management at Kraft General Foods and CEO of Information Resources, Broderbund Software and Advo. He has seen matrices at their best and at their worst and offered his perspective for this article along with his partners John Lawler and Linda Hlavac. The 12 ways to make matrix organizations more effective were built on their ideas.
Explanation:
Answer:
δu/δx+δu/δy = 6x-6x =0
9r^2
Explanation:
The flow is obviously two-dimensional, since the stream function depends only on the x and y coordinate. We can find the x and y velocity components by using the following relations:
u =δψ/δy = 3x^2-3y^2
v =-δψ/δx = -6xy
Now, since:
δu/δx+δu/δy = 6x-6x =0
we conclude that this flow satisfies the continuity equation for a 2D incompressible flow. Therefore, the flow is indeed a two-dimensional incompressible one.
The magnitude of velocity is given by:
|V| = u^2+v^2
=(3x^2-3y^2)^2+(-6xy)^2
=9x^4+18x^2y^2+9y^2
=(3x^2+3y^2)^2
=9r^2
where r is the distance from the origin of the coordinates, and we have used that r^2 = x^2 + y^2.
The streamline ψ = 2 is given by the following equation:
3x^2y — y^3 = 2,
which is most easily plotted by solving it for x:
x =±√2-y^3/y
Plot of the streamline is given in the graph below.
Explanation for the plot: the two x(y) functions (with minus and plus signs) given in the equation above were plotted as functions of y, after which the graph was rotated to obtain a standard coordinate diagram. The "+" and "-" parts are given in different colors, but keep in mind that these are actually "parts" of the same streamline.