30b + 100u = 900
5b + 25u = 200....multiply by -6
------------------
30b + 100u = 900
-30b - 150u = - 1200 (result of multiplying by -6)
------------------add
-50u = - 300
u = 6 <== upgrated phones sold
30b + 100u = 900
30b + 100(6) = 900
30b + 600 = 900
30b = 900 - 600
30b = 300
b = 10 <== basic phones sold
Let the smaller one is x so the larger is x+1
x(x+1)=1332
x^2+x=1332
x^2 +x -1332 =0
(x - 36)(x + 37) =0
so x = 36 or x = -37
therefor the larger integer is either 37 or -36
Answer:
Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."
Step-by-step explanation:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.
Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.
However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".
The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.
