Using the definition of vertical angles, the value of z is: 15.
<h3>Vertical Angles Pair</h3>
The two pairs of opposite angles formed when two straight lines intersect are called vertical angles, and are therefore congruent to each other.
Thus:
2z + 10 = 40
2z = 40 - 10
2z = 30
z = 30/2
z = 15
Therefore, using the definition of vertical angles, the value of z is: 15.
Learn more about vertical angles on:
brainly.com/question/1673457
9514 1404 393
Answer:
$7641.24
Step-by-step explanation:
The amortization formula tells the payment amount.
A = P(r/n)/(1 -(1 +r/n)^(-nt))
where principal P is paid off in t years with n payments per year at interest rat r.
Using the given values, we find ...
A = $7000(0.165/12)/(1 -(1 +0.165/12)^-12) = $7000×0.01375/(1 -1.01375^-12)
A = $636.77
The total of 12 such payments is ...
$636.77 × 12 = $7641.24
You will pay a total of about $7641.24.
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
Since the payment amount is rounded down, the actual payoff will be slightly more. Usually, the lender will round interest and principal to the nearest cent on each monthly statement. The final payment will likely be a few cents more than the monthly payment shown here.
GCF= 1
FACTORED VERSION = (X-1) (2X+3)(X+2)
Answer:
The scatter diagram that contains the correlation coefficient closest to r = 1 is the first one shown in the attached images.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient "r" measures how much two variables x and y are related. When the variables are highly related, the value of r is closer to one and the points contained in the scatter diagrams are assimilated more and more to a line. When the value of r is positive the relation is crescent and therefore the slope of the line drawn by the points in the diagram has a positive slope
Therefore, to answer this question, one must search among the attached images for the dispersion diagram in which the points resemble a straight line with a positive slope.
The scatter diagram that meets the requirements mentioned is the first one that appears in the attached images
An expression that is equivalent to 2.3 x 2.3 x 2.3 x 2.3 x 2.3 is 2.3^