Answer:
Jane's situation is the one which represents a porportional relationship.
Step-by-step explanation:
To verify the proportionality betwen a ratio you have to divide all the ratios and all them have to get the same constant factor.
So, if you divide the matt's ratios you aren't gonna find the same constant factor
12/1=12
20/2=10
31/2=15,5
But if you try with Jane's ones:
12/1=12
24/2=12
36/3=12
This 12 is the known constant factor, which show us that these ratios are proportional.
Assuming a diagram similar to the one I've attached, ∠<em>YVZ</em> is a vertical angle to ∠<em>WVX</em>, which means they have an equal measure. Additionally, ∠<em>WVZ</em> and ∠<em>WVX</em> form a linear pair, which means they are supplementary (sum to 180°). That means we start out with the equation

We combine our like terms (the
<em>x</em>'s get combined, then the constants get combined) and have:

Cancel the 9 first by subtraction:

Cancel the 19 by division:

Since we know that our angle we're looking for, ∠<em>YVZ</em>, is the same measure as ∠<em>WVX</em>, we substitute 9 in for <em>x</em>:
8(9)+28=72+28=100°
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We would apply the formula for determining compound interest which is expressed as
A = P(1 + r/n)^nt
Where
A = total amount in the account at the end of t years
r represents the interest rate.
n represents the periodic interval at which it was compounded.
P represents the principal or initial amount deposited
From the information given,
P = £600
r = 3.2% = 3.2/100 = 0.32
n = 1 because it was compounded once in a year.
t = 6 years
Therefore,.
A = 600(1 + 0.032/1)^1 × 6
A = 600(1.032)^6
A = £724.82
Answer:
No solution
Step-by-step explanation:
18x - 5 < 3(6x - 2) Distribute the 3 to (6x - 2)
18x - 5 < 18x - 6
-18x -18x Subtract 18x from both sides
-5 < -6 There is no solution because -5 is not less than -6.
If this answer is correct, please make me Brainliest!