Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
The domain of (f*g) (x) is the set of all real numbers; ( -∞, ∞)
Step-by-step explanation:
(f*g) (x) simply means we obtain the product of f(x) and g(x). We are given that;
f(x)=2x
g(x)= 1/x
(f*g) (x) = f(x) * g(x)
(f*g) (x) = 2x * 1/x = 2
This is a horizontal line defined everywhere on the real line. The domain of (f*g) (x) is thus ( -∞, ∞)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given points are :
Equation of line in two point form is given as:
Answer:
i believe is c
Step-by-step explanation:
because you addd 10 plus 8 times 6.
<span>-16x^3+4x=0
-4x(4x^2 - 1) = 0
-4x(2x+1)(2x - 1) = 0 (factor using a^2 - b^2 = (a+b)(a-b))
-4x = 0; x =0
2x +1 = 0;x = -1/2
2x - 1 =0; x = 1/2
answer: x = 0, x = 1/2 and x = -1/2</span>
