Letter D is the correct answer.
Even though both perspectives have the same object of study, both perspectives are equally useful since they provide different types of information. While microsociology focuses on smaller groups at a community level examining the interactions among individuals in their everyday lives, macrosociology emphasizes large-scale patterns and trends of populations and social systems.
Makers
have fewer resources; express themselves and experience the world by working on it (raising children or fixing a car); practical people who have constructive skills, value self-efficiency, and are unimpressed by material possessions except those with a practical or functional purpose
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
