It depends on the force that is applied to the object.
Answer:
Same direction to produce maximum magnitude and opposite direction to produce minimum magnitude
Explanation:
Let a be the angle between vectors A and B. Generally when we add A to B, we can split A into 2 sub vectors, 1 parallel to B and the other perpendicular to B.
Also let A and B be the magnitude of vector A and B, respectively.
We have the parallel component after addition be
Acos(a) + B
And the perpendicular component after addition be
Asin(a)
The magnitude of the resulting vector would be
As A and B are fixed, the equation above is maximum when cos(a) = 1, meaning a = 0 degree and vector A and B are in the same direction, and minimum with cos(a) = -1, meaning a = 180 degree and vector A and B are in opposite direction.
Answer:
See below ~
Explanation:
An object will sink in water when its density is greater than that of water, which is 1 g/cm³.
Volume of the box is <u>1331 cm³</u>. (11³)
Maximum mass of sand will be 1331 g. [because 1331/1331 = 1 g/cm³]
- Volume of sand = Mass of sand / Density of sand
- Volume (sand) = 1331/3.5
- Volume (sand) = 380.29 cm³
If the volume of sand is <u>greater than 380.29 cm³</u>, the box will sink in water.
Answer:
A. Brahe and Kepler
Explanation:
The Copernican model was a heliocentric model of the universe. Copernicus thought that the Sun is stationary, and the Earth and the other planets are orbiting around it. He also noted that the stars are further away from the Sun compared to the distance between the Earth and the Sun. Three very important hings in his theory are that he thought that the Earth rotates around its own axis, revolves around the Sun, and has annual tilting of its axis. At some things, Copernicus was right with his theory, at some he wasn't, but anyway he made one giant step forward in the understanding of the universe. His theory was supported by many, though mostly after his death, with one of the most noticeable supporters of him being Ticho Brache and Kepler who made model of his theory, as well as improving it.
The correct answer is:
That the land where it specifically was has been moving and that years ago that place was under water.
Explanation:
Kansas has been the cause of some of the most luxurious fossil findings in US history. The fossil record of Kansas spans from the Cambrian to the Pleistocene. From the Cambrian to the Devonian, Kansas was coated by a shallow sea.
