Explanation:
For a theorem that says "if A then B", the converse is "if B then A."
__
The hing.e theorem has numerous parts to the hypothesis. Its converse retains many of those conditions, swapping only the relation between the included angle and the third side.
<u>theorem</u>: if two sides of one triangle are congruent to two sides of another, then the longest third side will be opposite the largest included angle.
<u>converse</u>: if two sides of one triangle are congruent to two sides of another, then the largest included angle will be opposite the longest third side.
Instead of relating the third side to the angle measure, the converse relates the angle measure to the third side.
1. 8+5=13
2. 13 x 3 x 10 = 13 x 30 = 390
Using the information above transform the ratio 8:5.
8 x 30 : 5 x 30
If you do this, you'll end up with the ratio:
240 : 150
This means that 240 adults attended whilst 150 children attended.
83 + 94 + 79 + 97 + 96 + 87 = 536.
536 ÷ 6 = 89.333333...
So, Lamonts' average is under 90.
