All categories

2 years ago

Which cup has more thermal energy?

Chemistry

1 answer:

dybincka [34]2 years ago

5 0

Question: Which cup has more thermal energy?

A. 2 liter cup of milk

B. 1 liter cup of milk

Answer: A. 2 liter cup of milk

Explanation:

We have milk in both of the containers. The milk in both containers is the same temperature, so we will have to measure the amount of molecules. The amount of molecules makes it warmer, and if it is warmer, that is more energy. 2 liters have more thermal energy than 1 liter, because it has more molecules.

Our answer is 2 liter cup of milk.

You might be interested in

For the following reactions, predict the products and write the balanced formula equation, complete ionic equation, and net ioni

stealth61 [152]

Answer:

Explanation:

To predict the products of these reactions we need to know the kind of reactions. All these reactions are double replacement reaction. In these kinds of reactions, the products will be the result of exchanging ions in the reactants. So, the first step is to identify the ions.

For the reaction, we have Hg2(NO3)2 and CuSO4. We have the ions Hg+1, NO3-1, Cu+2 and SO4-2

The way to make this exchange is putting together positive in one species with the negative of the other species. Following that rule we have

$Hg^{+1} - - - (SO_{4})^{-2}[/text]
the oxidation number will tell you the subscript for each species in the compound. In this case, is Hg2(SO4) [tex]Cu^{+2} - - - (NO_{3})^{-1} - - -> Cu(NO_{3})_{2} [/text] 
So, the products for this reaction will be
 [tex]Hg_{2} (NO_{3})_{2}(aq) + CuSO_{4}(aq) --> Hg_{2}SO_{4} + Cu(NO_{3})_{2}[/text]

After this, we proceed to balance the equation. For this, we check that we have the same number of each element on both sides of the equation. In this case, we can see that we have the same number, so the equation is balanced. Finally, we check the rules of solubility to see if the species are soluble in water or not. In this case sulfates area always soluble except for mercury so Hg2(SO4) precipitates in the solution (pre). Nitrates are always soluble so Cu(NO3)2 is soluble (aq) 
[tex] Hg_{2}(NO_{3})_{2}(aq) + CuSO_{4}(aq) - -> Hg_{2}SO_{4} (pre) + Cu(NO_{3})_{2}(aq)$

The complete ionic equation allows to show which of the reactants or products exist primarily as ions. For this reaction this will be:

$2Hg^{+1}(aq) + 2(NO_{3})^{-1}(aq) + (SO_{4})^{-2}(aq) + Cu^{+2}(aq) --> Hg_{2}SO_{4} (pre)+ Cu^{+2}(aq) + (NO_{3})^{-1}(aq) [/text]

To get net ionic equation we take away the ions that did not participate in the reactions. In other words the ones that are the same on both sides in the equation. In this case we see that [tex] Cu^{+2}(aq) and (NO_{3})^{-1}(aq) [/text] are the same on both sides so those ions are not include in the net ionic equation. This is:
[tex] 2Hg^{+1}(aq) + (SO_{4})^{-2}(aq) --> Hg_{2}SO_{4} (pre) [/text]

B [tex] Ni(NO_{3})_{2}(aq) + CaCl_{2}(aq)$

ions (1) $Ni^{+2} and (NO_{3})^{-1}$

ions (2) $Ca^{+2} and Cl^{-1}$

Exchanging

$Ni^{+2} ---- Cl^{-1} --> NiCl_{2}$

$Ca^{+2} --- (NO_{3})^{-1} --> Ca(NO_{3})_{2}$

Products

$Ni(NO_{3})_{2}(aq) + CaCl_{2}(aq) --> NiCl_{2} + Ca(NO_{3})_{2}$

The equation is already balanced

Chlorides are always soluble except Ag+, TI+, Pb+2 and Hg2+2. NiCl2 is soluble (aq)

Nitrates are always soluble. Ca(NO3)2 is soluble (aq)

Since both compounds are soluble, we can say that there is not reaction.

Complete ionic equation

$Ni^{+2}(aq) + 2(NO_{3})^{-1} (aq) + Ca^{+2}(aq) + 2Cl^{-1}(aq) - - > Ni^{+2}(aq) + 2(NO_{3})^{-1} (aq) + Ca^{+2}(aq) + 2Cl^{-1}(aq)$

Net ionic equation:

The ions in both sides of the equation are the same so all of them are cancelled and we cannot get a net ionic equation this explains why there is no reaction in this case.

C $K_{2}CO_{3}(aq) + MgI_{2}(aq)$

Ions(1) $K^{+1} and (CO_{3})^{-2}$

Ions(2) $Mg^{+2} and l^{-1}$

Exchanging

$K^{+1} --- l^{-1} - - > KI$

$Mg^{+2} --- (CO_{3})^{-2} - - > Ca(CO_{3})$

Products

$K_{2}CO_{3}(aq) + MgI_{2}(aq) - -> Kl + MgCO_{3}$

The equation is not balanced

Balance equation is

$K_{2}CO_{3}(aq) + MgI_{2}(aq) - -> 2Kl (aq) + MgCO_{3} (pre)$

iodides are always soluble except Ag+, TI+, Pb+2 and Hg2+2. KI is soluble (aq)

carbonates are always insoluble except group 1 cations. MgCO3 is insoluble (pre)

complete ionic equation

$2K^{+1}(aq) + (CO_{3})^{-2}(aq) + Mg^{+2}(aq) + 2l^{-1}(aq) - - > MgCO_{3} (pre) + 2K^{+1}(aq) + 2l^{-1}(aq)$

Net ionic equation

$(CO_{3})^{-2}(aq) + Mg^{+2}(aq) - - > MgCO_{3} (pre)$

D $Na_{2}CrO_{4}(aq) + AlBr_{3}(aq)$

Ions(1) $Na^{+1} and (CrO_{4})^{-2}$

Ions(2) $Al^{+3} and Br^{-1}$

Exchanging

$Na^{+1} ---- Br^{-1} - -> NaBr$

$Al^{+3} --- (CrO_{4})^{-2} - -> Al_{2}(CrO_{4})_{3}$

Products

$Na_{2}CrO_{4}(aq) + AlBr_{3}(aq) - -> NaBr + Al_{2}(CrO_{4})_{3}$

The equation is not balanced

Balance equation is

$3Na_{2}CrO_{4}(aq) + 2AlBr_{3}(aq) - -> 6NaBr + Al_{2}(CrO_{4})_{3}$

bromides are always soluble except Ag+, TI+, Pb+2 and Hg2+2. NaBr is soluble (aq)

chromates are always insoluble except group 1 cations. Al2(CrO4)3 is insoluble (pre)

$3Na_{2}CrO_{4}(aq) + 2AlBr_{3}(aq) - -> 6NaBr(aq) + Al_{2}(CrO_{4})_{3}(pre)$

Complete ionic equation

$6Na^{+1}(aq) + 3(CrO_{4})^{-2}(aq) + 2Al^{+3}(aq) + 6Br^{-1}(aq) - -> Al_{2}(CrO_{4})_{3}(pre) +6Br^{-1}(aq) + 6Na^{+1}(aq)$

Net ionic equation

$3(CrO_{4})^{-2}(aq) + 2Al^{+3}(aq) - -> Al_{2}(CrO_{4})_{3}(pre)$

6 0

3 years ago

When one form of energy is converted to another form in any physical or chemical change, energy input alwasy equals energy outpu

aliya0001 [1]

In the context of chemistry, yes. Energy input is always equal to the energy output.

5 0

3 years ago

Cu is in FCC structure. We know that even at close to melting temperature, vacancies are still sparsely distributed, i.e., it is

sveticcg [70]

Answer:

Explanation:

FCC is face centered cubic lattice. In FCC structure, there are eight atoms at the eight corner of the cubic unit cell and one atom centered in each of the faces. FCC unit cells consist of four atoms, (8/8) at the corners and (6/2) in the faces.

Given that, Cu has FCC structure and it contains a vacancy at origin (0, 0, 0). And there is no other vacancy directly adjacent to the vacancy at the origin. So, all the adjacent positions contain Cu atoms. Hence, the total number of adjacent atoms of the vacancy at origin can jump into this vacancy.

the above FCC unit cell clearly indicates that there are six adjacent atoms adjacent to the vacancy at origin

So, the total number of adjacent atoms of the vacancy at origin can jump into this vacancy is 6.

5 0

2 years ago

. Never start a job without knowing the ___________ and ______________ of the chemicals you are working with.

pashok25 [27]

Location,types that is your answer for this one hope i helped

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How does the arrangement of elements in periods relate to electron configuration

VashaNatasha [74]

Electronic Configuration of elements in a period is same because If you see the electronic Configuration of elements in a period you will notice that the valence shell electrons for all elements are present in the same Shell. For example, in first period consisting of Hydrogen and Helium, both the elements' valence electrons are present in the same Shell.
Electronic Configuration of Hydrogen,
1s^1
Electronic Configuration of Helium,
1s^2

Both elements' valance electrons are present in the 1st shell

(This is just a small example to understand the concept because other periods are long but the first period is short that's why I gave the example of the first period)

4 0

3 years ago