Lake effect is one condition
Sorry if this didn't help- I'm not quite sure what you're asking.
I believe this is electron degeneracy, because the star is essentially having too many reactions too fast and collapses in on itself eventually.
A) Agreed.
<span>b) Value agreed but units should be W (watts). </span>
<span>c) Here's one method... </span>
<span>15 miles = 24140 m </span>
<span>1 gallon of gasoline contains 1.4×10⁸ J. </span>
<span>So moving a distance of 24140m requires gasoline containing 1.4×10⁸ J </span>
<span>Therefore moving a distance of 1m requires gasoline containing 1.4×10⁸/24140 = 5800 J </span>
<span>Overcoming rolling resitance for 1m requires (useful) work = force x distance = 1000x1 = 1000J </span>
<span>So 5800J (in the gasoline) provides 1000J (overcoming rolling resistance) of useful work for each metre moved. </span>
<span>Efficiency = useful work/total energy supplied </span>
<span>= 1000/5800 </span>
<span>= 0.17 (=17%) </span>
At a particular location, when an an increase in the rate at which water moves from the hydrosphere to the atmosphere, an increase in humidity is expected at that location. The term "humidity" generally refers to the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere.
Answer:
option E
Explanation:
given,
diameter = 4 mm
shutter speed = 1/1000 s
diameter of aperture = ?
shutter speed = 1/250 s
exposure time to the shutter time
N is the diameter of the aperture and t is the time of exposure
now,
inserting all the values
N₂² = 4
N₂ = 2 mm
hence , the correct answer is option E
