Think of it like this — if American leaders had never made the *decision* to break away from Britain, America would still be a colony of Britain.
Decision making determines the course of events. This is because a certain decision will then trigger certain actions, which in the grand scheme of things will impact history.
Example; American leaders made the *decision* to break off from Britain, triggering the Revolutionary War and America’s Independence, thus that decision changed history.
Answer:
Puerto Rico, Philippines Islands, and Guam.
Explanation:
The character of being in an agreement with the standard of right conduct (morality)
The correct answer is reciprocal determinism.
Bandura's theory of reciprocal determinism proposes the idea that your behavior is influenced by the environment and your personal factors, but also it influences the environment and your personal factors - the relationship is reciprocal, as the name of the term says.
Hiya,
A strong Central government is bad because if the government releases a law that just so happens to be bad, it will apply to everyone and this could be horrible for the whole country. If state decisions are bad, it won't hurt the whole nation but only that said state. People fear a strong Central government might even overpower small state governments and lose independence.
Now the trouble with a limited government is that it takes time to make decisions and fraud can easily happen. With a limited government there is also limited happiness.
A solution to this would be to just have a little bit of both. Limited government can increase fairness and give more freedom and power to their people and kick out the terrible leaders whereas a strong central government you can also have the security and freedom.
Hope this helps, government was never fun tbh.
