The United States should have dropped the atomic bomb due to Truman having very little choice.
Few actions in the were were justifiable. Truman had very little choice because he was faced with the Japanese refusal to surrender. This decision was based of the ( estimated ) half a million allied casualties likely to be caused by invading homeland islands of Japan. Also, there were likely death tests from starvation for Civilians as the war dragged on well into 1946
He claimed that it was a new phenomenon because the postwar economy was booming in the US, unlike the rest of the world. As he claims, while there should be scarcity, there's an economy of abundance in the US, which goes against common sense.
Answer: They inhibit the development of new neurons in the hippocampus.
Explanation:
Elevated levels of stress hormones may lead to mood disorders when there is a development of new neurons in the hippocampus. The hippocampus is a section of the brain structure which is deep into a temporal lobe. It's observed to get damaged easily by stimuli when affected by psychiatric disorders.
Answer: The strength of the Neuropsychological approach is that "IT FOCUSES ON HUMAN BRAIN DAMAGED PATIENT". therefore the study of damaged human brain is the strength of the Neuropsychological approach.
The weaknesses of the Neuropsychological approach is that "IT USES A PREVIOUS CASE STUDY TO FOCUS ON HUMAN BRAIN DAMAGE". This means that he uses a previous case to conclude the solution of a recent brain damage.
Explanation: Neuropsychology is the study of psychological effect of a damaged brain in patient suffering from brain damage. It aim is to benefit the patient, by using previous case to study each case. It usually deals with case studies and quasi experimental.
Because it's optimum objective is to benefit it's patient, we can say that it's strength is stronger than its weakness.
Potlatch, ceremonial distribution of property and gifts to affirm or reaffirm social status, as uniquely institutionalized by the American Indians of the Northwest Pacific coast. The potlatch reached its most elaborate development among the southern Kwakiutl from 1849 to 1925. Although each group had its characteristic version, the potlatch had certain general features. Ceremonial formalities were observed in inviting guests, in speechmaking, and in the distribution of goods by the donor according to the social rank of the recipients. The size of the gatherings reflected the rank of the donor. Great feasts and generous hospitality accompanied the potlatch, and the efforts of the kin group of the host were exerted to maximize the generosity. The proceedings gave wide publicity to the social status of donor and recipients because there were many witnesses.
