Answer: The electronic configuration of Chlorine will be ![[Ne]3s^23p^5](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BNe%5D3s%5E23p%5E5)
Explanation: Chlorine is an element which belongs to the P-block of the periodic table. Its atomic number is 17.
Atomic Number = Number of electrons
Number of electrons = 17
The nearest noble gas which lies to Chlorine is Neon which has 10 electrons. Rest of the 7 electrons are filled in the 3s and 3p orbitals. Hence, the electronic configuration of Chlorine is
![[Cl]=[Ne]3s^23p^5](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BCl%5D%3D%5BNe%5D3s%5E23p%5E5)
Answer:
the density of the sample - the melting point of the sample
Explanation:
Intrinsic property is the property of matter which exists itself or within subject. In other words, it do not depend on the mass of the sample. An extrinsic property is not inherent or essential to subject which is being characterized. In other words, it depend on the mass of the sample.
For example,
Density, melting point are example of intrinsic property. Whereas, weight, volume are an example of extrinsic property.
Intrinsic properties helps to determine the matter. Thus, density of sample and melting point of sample is the answer.
Answer:
1 and 3 i think so i could be wrong
Confirmation bias<span>, also called </span>confirmatory bias<span> or </span>myside bias, is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses, while giving disproportionately less consideration to alternative possibilities.[Note 1][1]<span> It is a type of </span>cognitive bias<span> and a systematic error of </span>inductive reasoning<span>. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a </span>biased way<span>. The effect is stronger for </span>emotionally<span> charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. People also tend to interpret ambiguous </span>evidence<span> as supporting their existing position. Biased search, interpretation and memory have been invoked to explain </span>attitude polarization<span> (when a disagreement becomes more extreme even though the different parties are exposed to the same evidence), </span>belief perseverance<span> (when beliefs persist after the evidence for them is shown to be false), the irrational primacy effect (a greater reliance on information encountered early in a series) and </span>illusory correlation<span> (when people falsely perceive an association between two events or situations).</span>
