Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer: That class ain't for you vro.
Explanation:
The answer is A because she could be watching people while daydreaming
Answer:
Decrease; Less
Explanation:
The producer surplus is the difference between the minimum price that a producer is willing to accept for a product and the price he actually receives.
When the market price of a product falls, the producer surplus will decrease as well.
The lower market price implies that there will be less area between the supply curve and the market price of the product.
<span>Georgia company (a u.s. firm) wants to export to the country of Zumosa and conducts a country risk analysis. all country risk characteristics of Zumosa except a blockage of funds that are remitted by subsidiaries established in Zumosa should be examined for this purpose.</span>
