Answer:
Rate of formation of SO₃
= 7.28 x 10⁻³ M/s
Explanation:
According to equation 2 SO₂(g) + O₂(g) → 2 SO₃(g)
Rate of disappearance of reactants = rate of appearance of products
⇒
-----------------------------(1)
Given that the rate of disappearance of oxygen =
= 3.64 x 10⁻³ M/s
So the rate of formation of SO₃
= ?
from equation (1) we can write
![\frac{d[SO_{3}] }{dt} = 2 [-\frac{d[O_{2}] }{dt} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bd%5BSO_%7B3%7D%5D%20%7D%7Bdt%7D%20%3D%202%20%5B-%5Cfrac%7Bd%5BO_%7B2%7D%5D%20%7D%7Bdt%7D%20%5D)
⇒
= 2 x 3.64 x 10⁻³ M/s
⇒
= 7.28 x 10⁻³ M/s
∴ So the rate of formation of SO₃
= 7.28 x 10⁻³ M/s
Answer:
Measuring with a ruler and using final volume minus initial volume
Explanation:
You can measure the volume of a geometric object by measuring its sides with a ruler and calculating the volume according to the corresponding formula for each object. For example, for a rectangular prism it would be

You can also measure the volume of an object by measuring how much water it displaces. To do this you have to fill a measuring cylinder with enough water for the object to be completely submerged and take note of the volume. Then, add the object and note again the volume of the water+object. The difference between both is the volume of the object.

The advantage of the second method is that it can be used for objects with irregular shapes as long as they do not float.
False
Although we use many of their ideas to describe atoms today, such as the existence of a tiny, dense nucleus in an atom (proposed by Rutherford), or the notion that all atoms of an element are identical (proposed by Dalton), some of their ideas have been rejected by the modern theory of the atom.
For example, Thompson came up with the plum pudding model to describe an atom, which resembled a sphere of positive charge with electrons embedded in it. We know now, however, that atoms are mostly empty space with a tiny, dense nucleus.
Another example is Dalton's atomic theory, which stated that atoms are indivisible particles. However, this was disproved by the discovery of subatomic particles.
Answer:
I think it is AM and frequency
Explanation:
Sorry if i'm wrong ;)