Why is the continuous presence of police officers and vigilante members of the public an ineffective crime prevention strategy?

Law

1 answer:

Lerok [7]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

A. crime is too widely dispersed for a limited number of police officers and vigilantes

Explanation:

I think it's A because we don't have much police officers that are always available to help others and they don't always come on time. So in conclusion this is a ineffective crime prevention strategy. -I hope this helped answer your question.

You might be interested in

What is custody and accesss

Yuki888 [10]

<h2>Question:</h2>

What is custody and access

<h2>Answer:</h2><h3>Custody</h3>

It's care when someone is in your custody. 
It's not just that they reside with you, it is that you are responsible for taking good care of them. If you are arrested, you will be taken into police custody.

<h3>Access </h3>

It's a ability, right, or permission to approach or entering a place.

<h2>#CARRYONLEARNING </h2><h2>#STUDYWELL </h2>

6 0

3 years ago

What is true about conflicts of interest?

Luda [366]

Answer:

A conflict of interest can come in a situation where an individual has competing interests or loyalties because of their duties to more than one person or organization. A person with a conflict of interest can't do justice to the actual or potentially conflicting interests of both parties. For instance, if internal auditor, who is in a position of trust, has a competing professional or personal interest.

Another example is if a person have a loyalty to an employer and also loyalty to a family business. Each of these businesses expects the person to have its best interest first. Thus, the conflict .

Such competing interests can make it difficult to fulfill his or her duties impartially.

A conflict of interest exists even if no unethical or improper act results.

6 0

4 years ago

What are the 3 appendices?

dmitriy555 [2]

Appendix I
Appendix II
Appendix III

3 0

3 years ago

I need help please and I will give u brainlist. At least give me 70+ words.

Andrews [41]

Answer:

Individual Privacy vs. National Security The need to protect National Security is far more important than individual privacy. The country is the freedom that we have. That freedom and the right to live freely is protected by various government agencies. From time to time, the privacy a person has may have to be invaded to guarantee the security of the country and other citizens.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

15. The description of the lawmaking process in

Aliun [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

8 0

4 years ago