It would be in a state of loss because the units manufactured neither reaches nor exceeds the break even point.
<h2>
Answer explanation:</h2>
If a coin is fair then it has two faces , one is heads and the another is tails.
The probability getting any favorable outcomes is given by the formula :-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bb7e/9bb7ee05e4c2aec5831bc9279157787c66326c73" alt="\dfrac{\text{Number of favorable outcomes}}{\text{Total outcomes}}"
So the factor effecting probability is just the number of favorable outcomes and total outcomes.
If a coin is tossed then the probability of getting heads will be :-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78517/78517dfb32c584216e2f5a491cdf39e3de63ddf3" alt="P(H)=\dfrac{1}{2}=0.5=50\%"
To get heads always this should be 1 , which can be happen if number of favorable outcomes is equal to total outcomes.
i.e. Number of heads = Number of total outcomes, this means coin should be biased.
Catching the coin in mid-air can never be a factor for this.
Therefore, the little brother's theory is false.
Answer:
Henry is 18 and Paul is 7
Step-by-step explanation:
I figured it out in my head.
Answer:
<h2>36b + 60c</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Put a = 6 to the expression 2a(3b + 5c):
(2)(6)(3b + 5c) = 12(3b + 5c) <em>use the distributive property</em>
= (12)(3b) + (12)(5c) = 36b + 60c
Answer:
$21.17
Step-by-step explanation:
Simple Interest=P(1+r)^t
Compounded Interest=P(e^rt)
SI=668*(1.0925)^5
SI=1039.64
CI=668(e^(0.0925*5))
CI=1060.81
1060.81-1039.64=21.17
So the difference is $21.17, thus doing compounded interest is better.