1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SOVA2 [1]
3 years ago
9

5k - 4p + 3k +2pPlease show working ​

Mathematics
2 answers:
xeze [42]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

here

5k - 4p + 3k + 2p

=5k + 3k - 4p + 2p

=8k - 2p ans.

AleksandrR [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: 8k -2p

Working:

= 5k - 4p + 3k + 2p

= 5k + 3k + 2p - 4p

= 8k - 2p

Answered by Gauthmath must click thanks and mark brainliest

You might be interested in
If h(x) = x - 7 and g(x) = x2, which expression is equivalent to (g0h)(5)?
notsponge [240]

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

I honestly couldn't tell you how to do this, I don't understand it. I just took the test and got this question correct. The answer is A, (5-7)^2.

6 0
2 years ago
Write the recurring decimal 0.4 as a fraction in its simplest form.
Ugo [173]

Answer:

2/5

Step-by-step explanation:

0.4 = 4/10 which in simplest form is 2/5

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Evaluate 7 + (-3x^2) For x = 0<br><br>A. -2<br>B. 0<br>C. 4<br>D. 7​
Goryan [66]

Answer:  D. 7

Step-by-step explanation:

The problem tells you that x = 0 so replace everything that is x in the equation with 0 so the problem becomes

7 + (-3(0)^2)

Now we just solve the problem normally.

solve the problem in the parenthesis first, we must multiply -3 times 0^2 is 0

so now our problem is 7 + 0 which is 7

8 0
3 years ago
Help me plz ASAP<br> A.2<br> B.1/2<br> C.2/3<br> D.3/2
BARSIC [14]

A

Step-by-step explanation:

First and foremost, we can rule out B and C because they are less than one and would make the hexagon smaller instead of bigger. Now, when we measure the units, we see that it goes up by 2 squares on the graph. So, by process of elimination and measurement, we get the answer of A.

3 0
2 years ago
The clock was exactly on time at 7am at 1pm the clock was 228 seconds late at that rate how slow was the clock half an hour
yan [13]

Answer:

19 seconds.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the clock was exactly on time at 7am, and at 1pm the clock was 228 seconds late, to determine, at that rate, how slow was the clock half an hour, the following calculation must be performed:

1 PM = 13:00

13 - 7 = 6

228/6 = 38

38/2 = 19

Thus, every half hour the clock is delayed 19 seconds.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Answer please and explain I’m having some trouble
    14·1 answer
  • Three rational numbers between 1/4 and 1/5
    12·2 answers
  • Helpppp in 8 asap plzz
    7·1 answer
  • Two families visit a zoo. The entrance charge for adults and children aged 16 or over is £x. The entrance charge for children ag
    9·1 answer
  • I need answers please help
    9·1 answer
  • Is this true or false? Pls help a dumb person out
    7·2 answers
  • Gregory is saving money to buy an anniversary present for his parents he found a website that will do it for $87.50 he earned $5
    11·2 answers
  • Please help ASAP !! Will mark brainless to whoever gets it right
    7·2 answers
  • What is the radius of a circle with a diameter of 6 meters
    15·2 answers
  • A company rents out 11 food booths and 20 game booths at the county fair. The fee for a food booth is $75 plus $4 per day. The f
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!