Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
Answer:
The answer for thue would happened to be 2
-1.
OK, so;
BDE and BED are congruent because the opposite sides are both congruent
To find BDE and BED you must subtract 66 degrees from 180 degrees.
You are then left with 114 as the sum of both the angles you need to find
Since they are congruent, all you need to do is divide by two
114/2=57 degrees for both BDE (a) and BED(b)
Now for angle A and C;
This is easy because they are both congruent to the first two!
So basically, all of question four is "57 degrees"
Sadly for number 5 i did not understand the question :"(
For 6 tho;
AC is parallel to DE because angle C is congruent to angle BED
All the others can be ruled out
For 7;
BD is half the length of AE, so:
4x+20=2(3x+5)
4x+20=6x+10
20=2x+10
10=2x
x=5
This means BD is 20 bc
3(5)+5
15+5
20
And AE is 40 bc
20X2=40
or...
4(5)+20
Answer:
AC = 15
Step-by-step explanation:
Use segment addition postulate to add AB + BC = AC. 10 + 5 = 15.
(drawing out the line helps you visualize the problem better)
y = 8
x = 575
We want to solve for b in the slope-intercept form y = mx + b.
To complete this problem, we need the value of m, the slope. If you know m, then just plug into y = mx + b this way:
8 = 575m + b
