Mater doesn't just appear or disappeared. Chemical elements are still there just the connections and how it combines changes.
So what goes into your chemical eqation must still exist after the change.
Rinse Bacon in Water Before Cooking to Reduce Shrinkage by 50 Percent. This sounds like a bizarre thing to do, but we're talking about less bacon shrinkage! Rinse your… At the end of the day, the best way to keep your bacon from shrinking when cooking is to cook it low and slow in the oven.
Answer:
Option B. 5 nC
Explanation:
From the question given above, the following data were obtained:
Capicitance (C) = 100 pF
Potential difference (V) = 50 V
Quantity of charge (Q) =?
Next, we shall convert 100 pF to Farad (F). This can be obtained as follow:
1 pF = 1×10¯¹² F
Therefore,
100 pF = 100 pF × 1×10¯¹² F / 1 pF
100 pF = 1×10¯¹⁰ F
Next, we shall determine the quantity of charge. This can be obtained as follow:
Capicitance (C) = 1×10¯¹⁰ F
Potential difference (V) = 50 V
Quantity of charge (Q) =?
Q = CV
Q = 1×10¯¹⁰ × 50
Q = 5×10¯⁹ C
Finally, we shall convert 5×10¯⁹ C to nano coulomb (nC). This can be obtained as follow:
1 C = 1×10⁹ nC
Therefore,
5×10¯⁹ C = 5×10¯⁹ C × 1×10⁹ nC / 1 C
5×10¯⁹ C = 5 nC
Thus, the quantity of charge is 5 nC
<h3><u>Answer;</u></h3>
Large mirrors are easier to build than large lenses.
<h3><u>Explanation;</u></h3>
- <em><u>Reflector telescopes have a number of advantages as compared to refracting telescopes and other types of telescopes. </u></em>
- <em><u>Reflector telescopes do not suffer from chromatic aberration because all wavelengths will reflect off the mirror in the same way. The support for the objective mirror is all along the back side so they can be made very large.</u></em>
- Additionally, reflector telescopes are cheaper to make than refractors of the same size. Also since in reflector telescopes light is reflecting off the objective, rather than passing through it, only one side of the reflector telescope's objective needs to be perfect.
