Did you just state the answer? Because it seems like you just answered the question for us.
Answer:
In a nutshell,
is not equivalent to
.
Step-by-step explanation:
Now we proceed to demonstrate that Edgar's statement is false:
1)
Given
2)
Modulative property/Existence of multiplicative inverse
3)

4)
Modulative property/Existence of multiplicative inverse
5)
/Result
In a nutshell,
is not equivalent to
.