Answer:
4.823 x 10^-19 J
Explanation:
Energy is calculated by E = hv where h - Planck's constant in joule.s
v - frequency.
in this particular question the wave length is 4.12 x 10^-7 m. to exhaustively use this we need a relation between wave length & frequency. c=wv where C is approximately 3 x 10^8m/s
-v = c/w = 3x10^8m/s / 4.12 x 10^-7m = 7.28 x 10^14 Hz or 1/sec
now we can simply use Planck's constant in E=hv =
(6.626 x 10^-34) x (7.28 x 10^14Hz) = 4.823 x 10^-19 J.
I believe the answer is: Protons and Neutrons
Protons weigh 1 amu while neutrons also weigh 1 amu. I’m not sure if they are talking about how many there is.
Atoms are made up of three subatomic particles called protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Protons and neutrons are located in the nucleus.
All protons have a positive charge.
All neutrons have no charge or are neutral.
Electrons orbit around the nucleus and have a negative charge.
Sodium bicarbonate and acetic acid are not good substitute for sodium azide in airbags since the require more mass and produce less gas.
<h3>Which is the better chemical for an airbag?</h3>
The chemical equation for the production of nitrogen gas from sodium azide is given below:
1 mole or 66 go of sodium azide produces 3 moles or 67.2 L of nitrogen gas.
The equation for the production of carbon dioxide from sodium bicarbonate and acetic acid is given below:
- Na₂CO₃ + CH₃COOH → CH₃COONa + CO₂ + H₂O
1 mole, 106 g of Na₂CO₃ and 1 mole, 82 g of CH₃COOH are required to produce 1 mole or 22.4 L of CO₂.
The mass of sodium azide required is less than that of sodium bicarbonate and acetic acid required. Also, sodium azide produces a greater volume of gas. Therefore, sodium bicarbonate and acetic acid are not good substitute for sodium azide in airbags.
In conclusion, sodium azide is a better choice in airbags.
Learn more about airbags at: brainly.com/question/14954949
#SPJ1
