1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataliya [291]
3 years ago
14

There is a good deal of concern these days about whether eating fast food is unhealthy. But most fast food is really tasty. Just

think of those juicy McDonald's hamburgers dripping with melted cheese, and the wonderful golden fries. And the crispy Chicken McNuggets, the creamy shakes, and the Egg McMuffins.
1. How could anyone complain about today's fast food?
Select one:
O a Red herring
O b. Straw man
O c. Slippery slope
O d. Appeal to pity
O e. No fallacy
Social Studies
1 answer:
Nikitich [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: The correct is option A A red herring

Step by step explanation:

The writer is somehow trying to misleads or distracts readers from a relevant or important question. In this context, It may either be a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences toward a false conclusion. It is therefore red herring.

Red herring is a kind of fallacy that is an irrelevant topic introduced in an argument to divert the attention of listeners or readers from the original issue. In literature, this fallacy is often used in detective or suspense novels to mislead readers or characters, or to induce them to make false conclusions.

You might be interested in
Republican presidential candidate William McKinley: Select one: a. lost to Bryan in 1896. b. was a stage actor of some renown. c
GenaCL600 [577]

Answer:

e. argued in favor of the gold standard.

Explanation:

A gold standard is an economic system that equate gold' weight to a certain amount of  currency. When it first enacted in united states, One Troy ounce of gold can be converted to $20.67.

McKinley use his support for the gold standard as his main platform during his presidential election. He argued that including  other metal beside gold (such as silver) as a monetary standard can create a volatility in the value of the dollar.

5 0
3 years ago
The _____ approach tends to see personality as an etic or universal phenomenon that is equivalently relevant and meaningful in t
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

The cross-cultural approach has a propensity to view personality as a universal or etic phenomena that is equally relevant and significant in the cultures being contrasted.

<h3>What does the term "cross-cultural" mean?</h3>

A comparable trend in different domains of cultural analysis is cross-cultural studies.

The study of cross-cultural communication examines the various ways that members of different cultural groups interact with one another (also see cross-cultural communication, interculturalism, intercultural relations, hybridity, cosmopolitanism, transculturation). The discussion of cultural interaction is sometimes referred to as cross-culturalism (See also multiculturalism, cosmopolitanism, transculturation, cultural diversity).

To know more about cross-cultural visit:

brainly.com/question/14271958

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
If you could have one exotic pet what would it be?
Wewaii [24]
A wolf or a bobcat!!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is it about adolescent thinking that makes them better problem solvers than children?
ikadub [295]
<span>Adolescents are better problem solvers than children because of brain development, they have a higher ability to think about abstract concepts and they have better control over their emotions and their thinking ability</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Adding premises to an inductive argument can make it go from strong to weak Adding new premises to an inductive argument can mak
expeople1 [14]

Answer:

This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>

Explanation:

The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.

The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.

In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Dr. davenport wants to conduct a study of whether high school students learn more efficiently while seated at a desk compared to
    13·1 answer
  • Martin needs to persuade his team to give up a telecommuting policy that has become ineffective for the group. he starts by tell
    9·1 answer
  • FIRST-PERSON TO ANSWER AND GET IT RIGHT I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Who was a famous anthropologist who believed that to truly learn about another' s culture and their customs you needed to live a
    8·2 answers
  • Q6. Amida recognizes that there are limitations to her proposed research study that explores students’ opinions about campus men
    8·1 answer
  • How did colonialism affect kenya
    6·1 answer
  • Suppose that sports fans in the United States were given a list of the names of all the medal winners in the last Olympics. Afte
    12·1 answer
  • Is presidio a military fort built by the English?
    14·1 answer
  • Compare the beliefs of the Baha’i community with those of the three Abrahamic religions and point out what is unique to Baha’i.
    8·1 answer
  • Give an account of Akbarnama of Abul fazal.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!