Answer:
e. argued in favor of the gold standard.
Explanation:
A gold standard is an economic system that equate gold' weight to a certain amount of currency. When it first enacted in united states, One Troy ounce of gold can be converted to $20.67.
McKinley use his support for the gold standard as his main platform during his presidential election. He argued that including other metal beside gold (such as silver) as a monetary standard can create a volatility in the value of the dollar.
The cross-cultural approach has a propensity to view personality as a universal or etic phenomena that is equally relevant and significant in the cultures being contrasted.
<h3>What does the term "cross-cultural" mean?</h3>
A comparable trend in different domains of cultural analysis is cross-cultural studies.
The study of cross-cultural communication examines the various ways that members of different cultural groups interact with one another (also see cross-cultural communication, interculturalism, intercultural relations, hybridity, cosmopolitanism, transculturation). The discussion of cultural interaction is sometimes referred to as cross-culturalism (See also multiculturalism, cosmopolitanism, transculturation, cultural diversity).
To know more about cross-cultural visit:
brainly.com/question/14271958
#SPJ4
<span>Adolescents are better problem solvers than children because of brain development, they have a higher ability to think about abstract concepts and they have better control over their emotions and their thinking ability</span>
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
