BE
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Hi<span>, Victoriasoto93p63zva!
To rewrite these equations in standard form you need to understand that standard form looks something like this Ax+By=C, now obviously there will be variations like </span>Ax-By=C or -Ax+By=C, etc..., but for these expressions, they would look like this:
<span>1. -8y + 0x = 37
2. 14x </span>+ 4y<span> = -18
3. x + </span>
y = 
<span>
4. 13x + 0y = -25
-</span><span>ASIAX</span><span> </span><span>Frequent Answerer</span>
To rewrite these equations in standard form you need to understand that standard form looks something like this Ax+By=C, now obviously there will be variations like </span>Ax-By=C or -Ax+By=C, etc..., but for these expressions, they would look like this:
<span>1. -8y + 0x = 37
2. 14x </span>+ 4y<span> = -18
3. x + </span>
4. 13x + 0y = -25
-</span><span>ASIAX</span><span> </span><span>Frequent Answerer</span>
Answer:
A. by the SAS postulate.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been two triangles. We are asked to determine the theorem by which both triangles could be proven congruent.
We can see that side DF of triangle DEF is equal to side AC of triangle ABC.
We can also see that side BC of triangle ABC is equal to side EF of triangle DEF.
The including angle between sides AC and BC of triangle ABC is equal to the including angle between sides DF and EF of triangle DEF.
Since both triangles have two sides and their included angles equal, therefore, triangle ABC is congruent to triangle DEF by SAS (Side-Angle-Side) congruence and option A is the correct choice.