The first and third graphs inverse will still be functions (although the first is iffy as it is hard to tell if when any x values are equal, if there are equal x values it will not be a function because then there will be multiple y values for a single x value. In simpler terms, if there is a truly horizontal line in that first graph, its inverse will not be a function as it will fail the vertical line test.)
The second graph will not be a function as each x value will have two y values, so it fails "the vertical line test".
Answer: She observed older fossils that contained many of the same minerals as the newer ones
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
first one, put value of x= -3 and y = 0
second one, pit vale of x=7 and y= -7
Step-by-step explanation:
first one,
-14(-3) -20(0) =42
or, 42-0 = 42
or, 42 = 42
proved
second one,
-14(7) -20(-7) = 42
or, -98 + 140=42
or, 42 = 42
proved
Hint: it will help to change all denominators to the same one using gcf or lcm
Answer:
Check the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Ans=
A: For m = 5: P(³≥1) = 1 – P(³=0) = 1 – 0.9973^5 = 0.0134
M = 10: 1 – 0.9973^10 = 0.0267
M = 20: 1 – 0.9973^20 = 0.0526
M = 30: 1 – 0.9973^30 = 0.0779
M = 50: 1 – 0.9973^50 = 0.126
18)
Ans=
Going by the question and the explanation above, we derived sample values of the mean as well as standard deviation in calculating our probability, since that is the necessary value in determining the probability of an out-of-bounds point being plotted. Furthermore, we would know that that value for the possibility would likely be a poor es²ma²on, cas²ng doubt on anycalcula²ons we made using those values
