Answer: When enough __energy__ is added to the substance, the solid reaches its _melting_ point and becomes a liquid
Explanation: since energy is being added the substance changes phase into a liquid .
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
Is that a question? .
..............................
Answer:
Ultraviolet wave
Explanation:
Ultraviolet waves would be best used to sterilize a surface expose to bacteria because it will completely destroy them.
Most medical equipment are usually sanitized by using this rays because the DNA of most bacteria can be innervated upon exposure to these ray.
Ultraviolet rays are energetic and more powerful than the normal visible light and subsequent long wavelength radiations.
Generally, ultraviolet rays is a very harmful electromagnetic radiation.
