Answer:
<u>b) Strict scrutiny</u>
Explanation:
The Supreme Court applies Strict Scrutiny (a thorough inspection) to a government action when the government is believed to have infringed an individual right explicitly outlined in the Constitution or have discriminated against a minority class or a class that has experienced a history of discrimination due to race, alienage or national origin. Therefore, when the courts rely on the assumption that based on discriminatory behavior historically, actions by elected officials or bodies likely violate constitutional rights, they are using strict scrutiny.
With the first one,you're going to want to use Ethos,or the appeal to emotions,for this to work. I would say this: There is an extent to which someone can be punished. If somebody committed murder,the death penalty,or more politely called "Capital Punishment",would honestly have no effect on them. It does not truly give them a chance to dwell on their actions and how they messed up someone's life. Not only that,but you also become a murderer if an innocent man is found guilty of a murder he didn't commit,which makes you no better than a murderer. Worse in fact because at least the person who actually did kill someone did it them selves and not with an executioner. I don't support Capital punishment because that puts someone else's blood on my hands.
As for the second one...I'd say this: By nature,humans are social creatures. We desire human contact and interaction. In fact,we NEED it in order to function normally. Capital Punishment only supports the tradition of "An Eye For An Eye And A Tooth For A Tooth." If you really want to punish someone,don't kill them physically,but instead mentally and socially. If you take away someone's ability to interact with people,it causes them to think back on their mistakes and it leaves them with no other choice but to confront their bad choices. Capital Punishment gets it over with quickly with no time to repent or ask for forgiveness,but life in prison with no chance of parole unless proven mentally capable by a team of psychologists,is by far the worst punishment you could ever give someone.
Answer:
TA's = Test the soil and advise the farmers what crops they should grow and how . JT's = : Provide door to door technical service to farmers. Monitor, track and report the animal health and status to technical officer regularly.
Explanation:
We should use the safety guide for ourselves when we can barely see the road to avoid traffic collisions, although If it's very misty or foggy outside, fog lights can both improve your visibility and the visibility of other vehicles.
<h3>
In a fog, what should you do to stay safe?</h3>
Take it more slowly and give yourself more time to get there. Use your low-beam headlights to make your vehicle visible to people both in front of you and behind you since this also activates your taillights. If you have fog lights, use them. Never turn on your high beams. When vision clears, you must turn off your fog lights since they blind other motorists and block your brake lights. According to the Highway Code, headlights must be used when you can't see more than 100 meters in front of you. Fog lights can also be used in the front or back, however, this is not required.
To learn more about road safety and fog, visit:
brainly.com/question/27945295
#SPJ4
<u>Q1</u> - He was kicked out of the first class car of a train
<u>Q2</u> - Raiding area farms and burning crops
Mahatma Gandhi was a notable Indian activist who contributed to India's independence and participated in the struggle against the end of English colonialism. Its form of peaceful demonstration and the resistance movement without violence represent <u>“Satyagraha”</u>, a term that Gandhi used to name the philosophy that made him known worldwide.
