1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vaieri [72.5K]
3 years ago
13

HELP!! Is –41/2 equivalent to (–4)1/2? Why or why not?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Oliga [24]3 years ago
8 0
No, they are not equivalent. The first term, -4 1/2 equals 4 whole units and one half unit. All negative. So it’s like you have someone 4 and 1/2 dollars.

The second term, (-4)1/2 means multiplying -4 times 1/2. Doing the multiplication for this gives you -4/2. Solving the division here is -2. It’s taking away 1/2 dollar 4 times.

I hope this helped. Happy to answer any questions you have.
You might be interested in
True or false dilation of a triangle are congruent to the original triangle
Semmy [17]

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Randy sold corn for 12 ears for $2.How much would Randy make if he sold 600 ears of corn?
meriva

Answer:

$120

Step-by-step explanation:

12 ears = $2

600 ears = ?

to determine the cost of 600easrsof corn  we find the cost of 1 ears of corn first

1 ears = 2/12 =0.1666

= 0.2 approximately

so 600ears of corn = 0.2 × 600 =120

5 0
3 years ago
He has 4 wizard hats, 5 robes, and 6 wands. How many different outfit combinations does he have?
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

120 combinations

Step-by-step explanation:

This is asking how many permutations are possible, and assuming that he must wear exactly 1 hat, robe and wand, the result is this...

4 (hats) * 5 (robes) * 6 (wands)=120 different possible combinations

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Express 3^4 = x as a logarithmic equation.
meriva

Note that the base in both the exponential form of the equation and the logarithmic form of the equation (above) is "b<span>", but that the </span>x<span> and </span>y<span> switch sides when you switch between the two equations. If you can remember this — that whatever had been the argument of the log becomes the "equals" and whateverhad been the "equals" becomes the exponent in the exponential, and vice versa — then you should not have too much trouble with solving log equations.</span>

<span><span>Solve </span><span>log2(x) = 4</span>.</span>

<span>Since this is "log equals a number", rather than "log equals log", I can solve by using The Relationship:<span><span> 
</span><span> </span></span><span>log2(x) = 4</span> <span>
24 = x</span><span> 
</span><span>16 = x</span></span>

<span><span><span>Solve </span><span>log2(</span></span>8<span><span>) = x</span>.</span></span>

<span>I can solve this by converting the logarithmic statement into its equivalent exponential form, using The Relationship:<span>log2(8) = x</span><span> 
</span>2<span> x</span><span> = 8</span><span>But </span><span>8 = 23</span>, so:2<span> x</span><span> = 23</span><span> 
</span><span>x = 3</span></span>

Note that this could also have been solved by working directly from the definition of a logarithm: What power, when put on "2<span>", would give you an </span>8<span>? The power </span>3, of course!

If you wanted to give yourself a lot of work, you could also do this one in your calculator, using the change-of-base formula:

<span>log2(8) = ln(8) / ln(2)</span>

Plug this into your calculator, and you'll get "3" as your answer. While this change-of-base technique is not particularly useful in this case, you can see that it does work. (Try it on your calculator, if you haven't already, so you're sure you know which keys to punch, and in which order.) You will need this technique in later problems.

<span><span>Solve </span><span>log2(x) + log2(x – 2) = 3</span></span><span><span>I can't do anything yet, because I don't yet have "log equals a number". So I'll need to use </span>log rules<span> to combine the two terms on the left-hand side of the equation:</span><span>log2(x) + log2(x – 2) = 3</span> <span>
log2((x)(x – 2)) = 3</span> <span>
log2(x2 – 2x) = 3</span>Then I'll use The Relationship to convert the log form to the corresponding exponential form, and then I'll solve the result:<span>log2(x2 – 2x) = 3</span> <span>
23 = x2 – 2x</span> <span>
8 = x2 – 2x</span> <span>
0 = x2 – 2x – 8</span> <span>
0 = (x – 4)(x + 2)</span> <span>
x = 4, –2</span><span>But if </span><span>x = –2</span>, then "<span>log2(x)</span>", from the original logarithmic equation, will have a negative number for its argument (as will the term "<span>log2(x – 2)"</span><span>). Since logs cannot have zero or negative arguments, then the solution to the original equation cannot be </span><span>x = –2</span>.<span><span>The solution is </span><span>x = 4</span>.</span></span>

Keep in mind that you can check your answers to any "solving" exercise by plugging those answers back into the original equation and checking that the solution "works":

<span>log2(x) + log2(x – 2) = 3</span> <span>
log2(4) + log2(4 – 2) ?=? 3</span> <span>
log2(4) + log2(2) ?=? 3</span>

Since the power that turns "2" into "4<span>" is </span>2<span> and the power that turns "</span>2" into "2" is "1", then we have:

<span>log2(4) + log2(2) ?=? 3</span> <span>
log2(2</span>2<span>) + log2(2</span>1) ?=? 3 <span>
2 + 1 ?=? 3</span> <span>
3 = 3</span>

The solution checks. Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2002-2011 All Rights Reserved

<span><span>Solve </span><span>log2(log2(x))   = 1.</span></span><span>This may look overly-complicated, but it's just another log equation. To solve this, I'll need to apply The Relationship twice:<span>log2(log2(x)) = 1</span> 
21 = <span>log2(x)</span> <span>
2 = log2(x)</span> <span>
x = 22</span> <span>
x = 4</span><span>Then the solution is </span><span>x = 4</span>.</span><span><span>Solve </span><span>log2(x2)  = (log2(x))2</span>.</span><span>First, I'll write out the square on the right-hand side:<span>log2(x2) = (log2(x))2</span> <span>
log2(x2) = (log2(x)) (log2(x))</span>Then I'll apply the log rule to move the "squared", from inside the log on the left-hand side of the equation, out in front of that log as a multiplier. Then I'll move that term to the right-hand side:<span>2log2(x) = [log2(x)] [log2(x)]</span> <span>
0 = [log2(x)] [log2(x)]  –  2log2(x)</span>This may look bad, but it's nothing more than a factoring exercise at this point. So I'll factor, and then I'll solve the factors by using The Relationship:<span>0 = </span><span>[log2(x)] [log2(x) – 2]</span> <span>
log2(x) = 0  or  log2(x) – 2 = 0</span> <span>
20 = x   or  log2(x) = 2</span> <span>
1 = x  or  22 = x</span> <span>
1 = x  or  4 = x</span><span><span>The solution is </span><span>x = 1, 4</span><span>.</span></span></span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do I find Mean Absolute deviation again? I forgot. URGENT!
Luba_88 [7]

Answer:

To find the mean absolute deviation of the data, start by finding the mean of the data set. Find the sum of the data values, and divide the sum by the number of data values. Find the absolute value of the difference between each data value and the mean

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Two-digit natural numbers are formed, with replacement, from the digits 0 through 9.
    9·1 answer
  • What is 6r2 + r, r = 5
    15·1 answer
  • Write the equation in vertex form: Vertex is (1.-3) and passes through the point (-1,5)
    12·1 answer
  • Division sentence 100mL into 10equal parts how many mL should we pour in each cup
    9·1 answer
  • A blank is a unit rate with a denominator of 1 unit
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
    15·2 answers
  • Which problem solving strategy would be best to solve this problem?
    5·1 answer
  • The zeroes of the function are
    12·1 answer
  • I NEED HELP ASAPPPPP 6
    11·1 answer
  • Solve the formula <br> 9x + 6y = 4<br> for y.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!