Answer:
Function 2 has a greater initial valueStep-by-step explanation:An initial value of a function, aka y-intercept, is obtained by using x=0 and evaluating the function at that point. Evaluating the two functions given:Function1: Function2 has value 3 for x=0So, Function 2 has a greater initial valueFunction 2 has a greater initial valueStep-by-step explanation:An initial value of a function, aka y-intercept, is obtained by using x=0 and evaluating the function at that point. Evaluating the two functions given:Function1: Function2 has value 3 for x=0So, Function 2 has a greater initial value
Step-by-step explanation:
When changing fractions into decimals the whole number goes before the period and the fraction goes after.The denominator of the fraction will tell you whether or not you need to put any zeros before the numerator. If the denominator is 10 zeros are not needed.The end result is 7.2 and can be read as seven tenths.
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.
You need to substitute 9 with every x value in the equation.
So, 3(9)^2-7(9)+11
p(x)= 191
Answer:
i think its 1.5 im not sure tho 1.5 sounds the best
Step-by-step explanation:
