Answer:
If this is a multiple choice question, then the answer is D.
Explanation:
Compounds are composed of atoms, which are composed of subatomic particles and consist of matter. Since they are composed of atoms rather than vice-versa, compounds cannot be found inside atoms and are not the most basic form of matter (ruling out A and C). A pure substance contains atoms, which are each composed of subatomic particles. Therefore, a pure substance must have atoms if it contains subatomic particles (ruling out B). The only answer left is D.
Answer:
option (d)
Explanation:
The relation between the rms velocity and the molecular mass is given by
v proportional to \frac{1}{\sqrt{M}} keeping the temperature constant
So for two gases




The 'formulas' to use are just the definitions of 'power' and 'work':
Power = (work done) / (time to do the work)
and
Work = (force) x (distance) .
Combine these into one. Take the definition of 'Work', and write it in place of 'work' in the definition of power.
Power = (force x distance) / (time)
From the sheet, we know the power, the distance, and the time. So we can use this one formula to find the force.
Power = (force x distance) / (time)
Multiply each side by (time): (Power) x (time) = (force) x (distance)
Divide each side by (distance): Force = (power x time) / (distance).
Look how neat, clean, and simple that is !
Force = (13.3 watts) x (3 seconds) / (4 meters)
Force = (13.3 x 3 / 4) (watt-seconds / meter)
Force = 39.9/4 (joules/meter)
<em>Force = 9.975 Newtons</em>
Is that awesome or what !
The speed of light "within a vacuum" refers to the speed of electromagnetic radiation propagating in empty space, in the complete absence of matter. This is an important distinction because light travels slower in material media and the theory of relativity is concerned with the speed only in vacuum. In fact, the theory of relativity and the "speed of light" actually have nothing to do with light at all. The theory deals primarily with the relation between space and time and weaves them into an overarching structure called spacetime. So where does the "speed of light" fit into this? It turns out that in order to talk about space and time as different components of the same thing (spacetime) they must have the same units. That is, to get space (meters) and time (seconds) into similar units, there has to be a conversion factor. This turns out to be a velocity. Note that multiplying time by a velocity gives a unit conversion of

This is why we can talk about lightyears. It's not a unit of time, but distance light travels in a year. We are now free to define distance as a unit of time because we have a way to convert them.
As it turns out light is not special in that it gets to travel faster than anything else. Firstly, other things travel that fast too (gravity and information to name two). But NO events or information can travel faster than this. Not because they are not allowed to beat light to the finish line---remember my claim that light has nothing to do with it. It's because this speed (called "c") converts space and time. A speed greater than c isn't unobtainable---it simply does not exist. Period. Just like I can't travel 10 meters without actually moving 10 meters, I cannot travel 10 meters without also "traveling" at least about 33 nanoseconds (about the time it takes light to get 10 meters) There is simply no way to get there in less time, anymore than there is a way to walk 10 meters by only walking 5.
We don't see this in our daily life because it is not obvious that space and time are intertwined this way. This is a result of our lives spent at such slow speeds relative to the things around us.
This is the fundamental part to the Special Theory of Relativity (what you called the "FIRST" part of the theory) Here is where Einstein laid out the idea of spacetime and the idea that events (information) itself propagates at a fixed speed that, unlike light, does not slow down in any medium. The idea that what is happening "now" for you is not the same thing as what is "now" for distant observers or observers that are moving relative to you. It's also where he proposed of a conversion factor between space and time, which turned out to be the speed of light in vacuum.
Answer:
Kinetic energy
Explanation:
When an apple falls from a tree it has to do with the energy from gravity. Gravity energy turns into kinetic energy once its in motion.
Sorry if im wrong