What will most likely happen with bar magnets aligned NS NS

Which of the following could be cause of a irregular systolic reading

Paul [167]

Maybe number 4 could help.

3 0

3 years ago

A bowling ball of mass 5.8 kg moves in a

evablogger [386]

Answer:

Velocity of the ping pong ball must be = V2= 6,035.34m/s

Explanation:

M1= momentum of the bowling ball

m1 = mass of the bowling ball= 5.8kg

v1= velocity of the bowling ball= 1.59m/s

M2= momentum of the ping pong ball

m2= mass of the ping pong ball= 1.528 g/1000= 0.001528kg

v2= velocity of the ping pong ball

Momentum of the bowling ball= M1= m1v1= 5.8* 1.59= 9.222 kg-m/s

Momentum of the ping pong ball = M2= M1= m2v2

= 0.001528 *v2= 9.222

v2= 9.222/0.001528= 6,035.34 m/s

7 0

3 years ago

The two pucks of equal mass did not move linearly (they came to a stop) after the collision due to the conservation of linear mo

weeeeeb [17]

Compared to the pucks given, the pair of pucks will rotate at the same rate.

Answer: Option A

<u>Explanation:</u>

The law of conservation of the angular momentum expresses that when no outer torque follows upon an article, no difference in angular momentum will happen. At the point when an item is turning in a shut framework and no outside torques are applied to it, it will have no change in angular momentum.

The conservation of the angular momentum clarifies the angular quickening of an ice skater as she brings her arms and legs near the vertical rotate of revolution. In the event, that the net torque is zero, at that point angular momentum is steady or saved.

By twice the mass yet keeping the speeds unaltered, also twice the angular momentum's to the two-puck framework. Be that as it may, we likewise double the moment of inertia. Since $L=I \times \omega$ , the turning rate of the two-puck framework must stay unaltered.