set h=0 and solve for <span>t
</span>So: 0 = 32t - 16^2
<span>32t−16<span>t2</span>=0</span><span>16t(2−t)=0</span><span><span>t=2
</span></span>
The answer to the question is C.
Answer: dependent
Step-by-step explanation:
Remark
This will be a little late, but I'll answer it anyway. The more you see of the sine law, the clearer it will be.
Step One
Set up the sine Law.
Step Two
Substitute values
Sin(x) = ??
sin(75) = 0.9659
Step Three
Cross multiply and Solve
22* Sin(x) = 12 * 0.9659
22* Sin(x) = 11.591 divide by 22
sin(x) = 11.591 / 22
sin(x) = 0.5269
Step Four
You have to know how to use the inverse of an angle to get the answer. I do it as my calculator would do it. If it doesn't work with yours, let me know.
x = sin^-1(0.5269)
2nd F
Sin^-1
(
0.5269
)
=
You should get 31.79 degrees.
Based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
<h3 /><h3>What is congruency?</h3>
The Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem (SAS) defines two triangles to be congruent to each other if the included angle and two sides of one is congruent to the included angle and corresponding two sides of the other triangle.
An included angle is found between two sides that are under consideration.
See image attached below that demonstrates two triangles that are congruent by the SAS Congruence Theorem.
Thus, two triangles having two pairs of corresponding sides and one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent to each other is not enough justification for proving that the two triangles are congruent based on the SAS Congruence Theorem.
The one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent MUST be "INCLUDED ANGLES".
Therefore, based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
Learn more about congruency at
brainly.com/question/14418374
#SPJ1
