Answer:
2.387 mol/L
Explanation:
The reaction that takes place is:
- 2HCl + Ba(OH)₂ → BaCl₂ + 2H₂O
First we <u>calculate how many moles of each reagent were added</u>:
- HCl ⇒ 200.0 mL * 3.85 M = 203.85 mmol HCl
- Ba(OH)₂ ⇒ 100.0 mL * 4.6 M = 460 mmol Ba(OH)₂
460 mmol of Ba(OH)₂ would react completely with (2*460) 920 mmol of HCl. There are not as many mmoles of HCl so Ba(OH)₂ will remain in excess.
Now we <u>calculate how many moles of Ba(OH)₂ reacted</u>, by c<em>onverting the total number of HCl moles to Ba(OH)₂ moles</em>:
- 203.85 mmol HCl *
= 101.925 mmol Ba(OH)₂
This means the remaining Ba(OH)₂ is:
- 460 mmol - 101.925 mmol = 358.075 mmoles Ba(OH)₂
There are two OH⁻ moles per Ba(OH)₂ mol:
- OH⁻ moles = 2 * 358.075 = 716.15 mmol OH⁻
Finally we <u>divide the number of OH⁻ moles by the </u><u><em>total</em></u><u> volume</u> (100 mL + 200 mL):
- 716.15 mmol OH⁻ / 300.0 mL = 2.387 M
So the answer is 2.387 mol/L
<h2>Nuclear Fission and Nuclear Fusion - Option C</h2>
Nuclear fission and nuclear fusion both of these processes can provide energy. Nuclear fission is the process in which heavy nucleus splits into smaller parts. When they split into smaller particles then it releases energy.
On the other hand, nuclear fusion is the process in which small particles fuse together to form a heavy nucleus. With the formation of heavy nucleus, it also provides energy.
Therefore, both these processes release or provide energy.
Answer:
The new force will be \frac{1}{100} of the original force.
Explanation:
In the context of this problem, we're dealing with the law of gravitational attraction. The law states that the gravitational force between two object is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of a distance between them.
That said, let's say that our equation for the initial force is:
![F = G\frac{m_1m_2}{R^2}The problem states that the distance decrease to 1/10 of the original distance, this means:[tex]R_2 = \frac{1}{10}R](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F%20%3D%20G%5Cfrac%7Bm_1m_2%7D%7BR%5E2%7D%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EThe%20problem%20states%20%20that%20%20the%20distance%20decrease%20to%201%2F10%20of%20the%20original%20distance%2C%20this%20means%3A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3E%5Btex%5DR_2%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B10%7DR)
And the force at this distance would be written in terms of the same equation:
Find the ratio between the final and the initial force:
Substitute the value for the final distance in terms of the initial distance:
Simplify:
This means the new force will be \frac{1}{100} of the original force.
It would be 7 because the acid and base cancel out each other
Answer:
Explanation:
Well, obviously a molecule with polar bonds can be polar in itself. It's like saying I am an atheltic person who can just reach the basketball rim with my head and also I can dunk.
But if the question is how can a molecule that in non-polar have polar bonds, well, its because the polar bonds' dipole cancels each other out. It's like a tight rope. If a person pulls in one direction, it intuitively, the rope would go in that direction. However, if a person pulls in the other direction with the same amount of force, the rope stays still. This is the same case. Although molecules can have different electronegativities, the pull of electrons in one direction is cancelled out by a pull in the opposite direction, making the net dipole 0.
This is common for main VSERP shaped molecules like linear, trigonal planar, tetrahedral, trigonal bipyramidal, and octahedral.
