Answer:
λ = 3.2 x 10⁻⁷ m = 320 nm
Explanation:
The relationship between the velocity of electromagnetic waves (UV rays) and the their frequency is:
v = fλ
where,
v = c = speed of the electromagnetic waves (UV rays) = speed of light
c = 3 x 10⁸ m/s
f = frequency of the electromagnetic waves (UV rays) = 9.38 x 10¹⁴ Hz
λ = wavelength of the electromagnetic waves (UV rays) = ?
Therefore, substituting the values in the relation, we get:
3 x 10⁸ m/s = (9.38 x 10¹⁴ Hz)(λ)
λ = (3 x 10⁸ m/s)/(9.38 x 10¹⁴ Hz)
<u>λ = 3.2 x 10⁻⁷ m = 320 nm</u>
So, the radiation of <u>320 nm</u> wavelength is absorbed by Ozone.
I think that this is false but I am not sure
Answer:
first blank is chemical second blank is kinetic energy
Gravitational potential energy :)
It's not possible to answer the question exactly the way it's written.
That's because we don't know anything about the direction they
drive at any time during the trip.
You see, "velocity" is not just a word that you use for 'speed' when
you want to sound smart and technical, like this question is doing.
"Velocity" is a quantity that's made up of speed AND THE DIRECTION
of the motion. If you don't know the direction of the motion, then you
CAN'T tell the velocity, only the speed.
Here are the average speeds that Lori's family drove on each leg
of their trip:
Speed = (distance covered) / (time to cover the distance) .
Leg-A:
Speed = 15km/10min = 1.5 km/min
Leg-B:
Speed = 20km/15min = (1 and 1/3) km/min
Leg-C
Speed = 24km/12min = 2 km/min
Leg-D:
Speed = 36km/9min = 4 km/min
Leg-E:
Speed = 14km/14min = 1 km/min
From lowest speed to highest speed, they line up like this:
[Leg-E] ==> [Leg-B] ==> [Leg-A] ==> [Leg-C] ==> [Leg-D]
1.0 . . . . . . . . 1.3 . . . . . . . 1.5 . . . . . . . 2.0 . . . . . . . 4.0 . . . . km/minute
Whoever drove Leg-D should have been roundly chastised
and then abandoned by the rest of the family. 36 km in 9 minutes
(4 km per minute) is just about 149 miles per hour !
