I recommend google it's very cool thing called a search engine.
This means that, for example if a group or two people are having an argument it’s best that it doesn’t in with one side of the argument winning, or feeling as if they’re more correct than the others. It’s best that both people or peoples feel like they’ve won in the argument, this way it wouldn’t involve any long term conflict.. which could lead to something very unnecessary or sometimes even harmful to both people.
I can't see any of the other options, but I'll give you the basic definition of government according to the U.S. Constitution:
Government is in place "to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our prosperity".
In a nutshell, government is there to protect the rights of the people, nothing else. Not sure what they gave you on your question, but I hope this helps!
Her continued presence is morally acceptable in order to eradicate discrimination and promote equality. She has an ethical obligation to receive respect, be treated equally to other employees in the organization, and be free from harassment.
Discriminating against Hispanics in America is wrong for everyone, not just Hispanics. Professionals also have their own codes of ethics. It is moral to continue the employee's employment if she has a reasonable reason to think that by doing so, she can improve her behavior.
The action is ethical if the employee thinks she can prove it to the AG, EEOC, or law enforcement (as necessary) with enough documentation of the behavior. It might be ethical or it might not, depending on the facts, if the employee is facing a personal dilemma regarding her employability and behavior.
To learn more about ethical obligation here,
brainly.com/question/27824491
#SPJ4
New york, i think.
not much more information on that,
that i can think of
bye
