No, the properties of a substance are not affected by the amount of a substance.
Answer: My opinion is the second one because a lot of humans uses technology and technilogy replaces a lot of stuff.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option 1, Cl is reduced and gains electrons
Explanation:
HClO₃ → HClO₂
In HClO₃, chlorine acts with +5 in the oxidation state
In HClO₂,, chlorine acts with +3 in the oxidation state.
The state has been reducted, so the Cl has been reduced. As it was reduced, it means that has won e⁻, in this case 2
Cl⁻⁵ → Cl⁻³ + 2e⁻
Answer:
Anything not on the periodic table is an element non example! ... So, for a substance to be an element, all of its atoms must have the same number of protons. Examples of elements include hydrogen, lithium, nickel, and radium.
Explanation:
Dalton Found out there was a small, hard indestructible sphere that is the smalles part of an element.He created his own Atomic Theory:
-All Matter is made up of small particles called atoms.
-Atoms cannot be created, destroyed, or divided into smaller particles.
-All atoms of the same element are identical in mass and size. The atoms of one element are different in mass and size from the atoms of other elements.
<span>-Compounds are created when atoms of different elements link together in definite proportions.
</span><span>Rutherford had found the positively charged nucleus in the middle of every atom using his Gold Foil Experiment. While doing this experiment, he expected these particles to just pass right through the foil but they bounced right back. He also proposed there were negatively charged electrons revolving around the nucleus.
</span><span>Thompson found negative electrons and inferred atoms also contain negative particles. He inferred there was a lump of positively charged material, with negative electrons throughout. He used the Raisins Bun Model to explain.
</span>Chadwick <span>proved that it consisted of a neutral particle with about the same mass as a proton "Neutron" is the name given to the particle</span>
Bohr believed Rutherford's prediction was correct, but it wasn't complete. Bohr proposed electrons could only move between energy levels, rather then being able to move everywhere.
