Answer:
Whether sociological studies can predict or improve society
Explanation:
The antipositivism proposes that social science researchers must first be aware that the concepts, ideas and language of research shape their perception of the social world under investigation. On the other hand, positivism believes that a theory can only be taken for granted if it is proven from valid scientific techniques.
According to these concepts, we can conclude that the difference between positivism and antipositivism is better represented by the option: "whether sociological studies can predict or improve society
".
The Egypt social pyramid shape life in the new kingdom because the social pyramid gave ranks for all the people.
Well, this question cannot really be answered generally. It's a matter of judgement, and it's best judged for particular cases. The consideration of this depends on two factors:
what are the probable costs (in terms of human life, and the quality of human life) of the invasion? - it's important not to diminish these factors, as the assessments of casualties often tend to be lower than the actual numbers
how high is the risk of the alternative. Do we have a good, unbiased reason to believe that a spread of nuclear weapons (unchecked spread, or spread that gives reasons to worry. US has a lot of nuclear weapons, but since it's not planning to use them on other country, it wouldn't be justified to attach the US) will happen? what kind of conflict are we risking?
in any case, this is not an easy question, and perhaps there will never be a good answer for it.
Explanation:
Last year, rice was grown across 83,000 hectare area, said Bhattarai, attributing the increment in crop production to the use of improved rice seeds and decrease in pest attacks.
pls rate.....
