Answer:
mass of X extracted from the aqueous solution by 50 cm³ of ethoxy ethane = 3.33 g
Explanation:
The partition coefficient of X between ethoxy ethane (ether) and water, K is given by the formula
K = concentration of X in ether/concentration of X in water
Partition coefficient, K(X) between ethoxy ethane and water = 40
Concentration of X in ether = mass(g)/volume(dm³)
Mass of X in ether = m g
Volume of ether = 50/1000 dm³ = 0.05 dm³
Concentration of X in ether = (m/0.05) g/dm³
Concentration of X in water = mass(g)/volume(dm³)
Mass of X in water left after extraction with ether = (5 - m) g
Volume of water = 1 dm³
Concentration of X in water = (5 - m/1) g/dm³
Using K = concentration of X in ether/concentration of X in water;
40 = (m/0.05)/(5 - m)
(m/0.05) = 40 × (5 - m)
(m/0.05) = 200 - 40m
m = 0.05 × (200 - 40m)
m = 10 - 2m
3m = 10
m = 10/3
m = 3.33 g of X
Therefore, mass of X extracted from the aqueous solution by 50 cm³ of ethoxy ethane = 3.33 g
If you mean the industrialized apple juice then yes. Even though there are several different compounds and some of them aren't actually dissolved in the liquid, since you can't actually distinguish between them using only your eyes and they do no separate naturally it is actually a homogeneous mixture.
The particles in a solid are tightly packed and locked in place. Although we cannot see it or feel it, the particles are vibrating in place.
As these molecules heat up, they will vibrate more vigorously, and will eventually turn to water, then gas.
Answer:
B. PROTONS EXHIBIT STRONGER PULL ON OUTER f ORBITALS
Explanation:
Lanthanide contraction is the greater than normal decrease in the ionic radius of the lanthanide series from atomic number 57 to atomic number 71. This decrease is rather not expected of the ionic radii of these elements and they result in the greater decrease in the subsequent series of the lanthanides from the atomic number 72. The cause of which is as a result of the poor shielding effects of the nuclear charge around the electrons of the f orbitals. So therefore, protons are strongly pulled out of the 4f orbital and as a result of the poor shielding effect which causes the electrons of the 6s orbitals to be drawn more closer to the nucleus and hence resulting in a smaller atomic radii. It is worthy to note that the shielding effects of the inner electrons decreasing from s orbital to the f orbital; that is s > p > d > f. So from the decrease in the shielding effects from s to the f orbitals, lanthanide contraction results from the inability of the orbitals far away from s like the 4f orbiatls to shield the outermost shells of the lanthanide elements. So the cause of lanthanide contraction is the action of the protons which strongly pull the electrons of the f orbitals because of the poor shielding effects due to the distance of this orbital from the nucleus.
