The statement " Brand-W motor does 7,640 N of your toughest work." can be truthfully use.
Advertisement Rules:
- An advertiser can not compare its products using the other companies name.
- An advertiser can not make the false statement in its advertisement.
Here, the brand-W has the power rating of 7,640 W that is less than brand-Y. Advertiser cannot compare his brand using the name of Brand X, Y, or Z.
Therefore, the statement " Brand-W motor does 7,640 N of your toughest work." can be truthfully use.
To know more about Advertisement Rules:
brainly.com/question/13679377
Answer:
a kind of radiation including visible light, radio waves, gamma rays, and X-rays, in which electric and magnetic fields vary simultaneously
The true scientific way is the last: using the water displacement method
After the great 1906 San Francisco earthquake, geolophysicistHarry Fielding Reid examined the displacement of the ground surface along the San Andreas Fault. He concluded that the quake must have been the result of the elastic reboundof the strain energy in the rocks on either side of the fault.
strain energy is 0. 5x force x (compression) X (compression)
There is a lot of force and a bit of compression when rocks squash up against other rocks causing earthquakes
Explanation:
They probably put "rolls without slipping" in there to indicate that there is no loss in friction; or that the friction is constant throughout the movement of the disk. So it's more of a contingency part of the explanation of the problem.
(Remember how earlier on in Physics lessons, we see "ignore friction" written into problems; it just removes the "What about [ ]?" question for anyone who might ask.)
In this case, you can't ignore friction because the disk wouldn't roll without it.
As far as friction producing a torque... I would say that friction is a result of the torque in this case. And because the point of contact is, presumably, the ground, the friction is tangential to the disk. Meaning the friction is linear and has no angular component.
(You could probably argue that by Newton's 3rd Law there should be some opposing torque, but I think that's outside of the scope of this problem.)
Hopefully this helps clear up the misunderstanding for you.
