It would be CH2! you’re just simplifying C4H8, 4 can go into C4 1 time (so we just say C) and 4 can go into H8 2 times (H2)
The concentration of diluted solution is 0.16 M
<u>Explanation:</u>
As, the number of moles of diluted solution and concentrated solution will be same.
So, the equation used to calculate concentration will be:
where,
are the molarity and volume of the concentrated HCl solution
are the molarity and volume of diluted HCl solution
We are given:
Putting values in above equation, we get:
Hence, the concentration of diluted solution is 0.16 M
Answer:
b) The dehydrated sample absorbed moisture after heating
Explanation:
a) Strong initial heating caused some of the hydrate sample to splatter out.
This will result in a higher percent of water than the real one, because you assume in the calculation that the splattered sample was only water (which in not true).
b) The dehydrated sample absorbed moisture after heating.
Usually inorganic salts may absorbed moisture from the atmosphere so this will explain the 13% difference between calculated water percent the real content of water in the hydrate.
c) The amount of the hydrate sample used was too small.
It will create some errors but they do not create a difference of 13% difference as stated in the problem.
d) The crucible was not heated to constant mass before use.
Here the error is small.
e) Excess heating caused the dehydrated sample to decompose.
Usually the inorganic compounds are stable in the temperature range of this kind of experiments. If you have an organic compound which retain water molecules you may decompose the sample forming volatile compounds which will leave crucible so the error will be quite high.
Answer:
Gas liquid solid
Explanation:
gases have a weak potential since they have a weak bond between molecules while in solids it's the strongest making them vibrate in a fixed position
I forgot what quantum means to be honest, the Bohr model In atomic physics, the Bohr model or Rutherford–Bohr model, presented by Niels Bohr and Ernest Rutherford in 1913, is a system consisting of a small, dense nucleus surrounded by orbiting electrons—similar to the structure of the Solar System, but with attraction provided by electrostatic forces in place of gravity. After the cubical model (1902), the plum pudding model (1904), the Saturnian model (1904), and the Rutherford model (1911) came the Rutherford–Bohr model or just Bohr model for short (1913). The improvement over the 1911 Rutherford model mainly concerned the new quantum physical interpretation.
