Answer:
Glossopteris and Lystrosaurus
Explanation:
Glossopteris is an ancient plant flora and Lystrosaurus is a fossil fauna, and both are found in many of the landmasses on earth. The Glossopteris flora appeared about 300 to 200 million years back and the Lystrosaurus appeared about 250 million years back on earth. They both existed from the time of late Permian to early Triassic age.
Both these fossils played an important role in understanding the continental drift theory or the plate tectonic theory. This evidence enabled geologists to understand how the continents have moved across the large ocean basin from one place to another and at what rate they are drifting currently. It helped in understanding how the super-continent Pangaea had broken into Laurasia and Gondwanaland, and further broken into the present location of the plates.
I’m not sure if this is the right answer but the doctor would continue you to take it the few days after you have been feeling better to ensure the bacterial infection is completely gone?
Answer:
I, II, III
Explanation:
A threshold stimulus is a stimulus that is capable to produce a response in excitable tissues such as neurons and muscle fibers. At threshold potential, the outward movement of K+ and inward movement of Na+ become equal to each other. When the potential exceeds the threshold potential, more and more Na+ enter the cell to depolarize it and to allow the opening of Na+ channels. Therefore, to fire an action potential, the threshold must be exceeded.
Conduction of action potential is all or none phenomenon which means that either it occurs or it does not occur. As an impulse is passed by each successive part of an exon, it enters the refractory period during which there is no conduction of nerve impulse. It ensures the one-way conduction of impulse from the cell body to the axon terminal only.
The answer should be the contraction of muscles.
Hope this helps mate.
Answer:
taking a closer look at the natural world
Explanation:
using prior knowledge is basic common sense. so no.
requiring evidence and thinking logically is following a rule. so no.
following strict rules when using human test subjects. right off the bat, "strict rules" is an immediate no.
taking a closer look at the natural world. that's creative because they look for the answer around them.
