Answer: A)There is a high ratio of energy to cost
Positives:
A Chunk of Uranium can power a city a lot longer than a chunk of coal.
It also does not contribute to pollution since what comes out of the tower is steam.
Negatives:
It is very expensive to build and maintain a nuclear power plant at first so investors whom want money up front are more reluctant to loan money for one.
If the plant does melt down it is very bad for the enviroment and its people, for example Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukraine will not be able to be lived in for approximently 20,000 years.
The given question is incomplete. The complete question is:What is the relative atomic mass of a hypothetical element that consists isotopes in the indicated natural abundances.
Isotope mass amu Relative abundance
1 77.9 14.4
2 81.9 14.3
3 85.9 71.3
Express your answer to three significant figures and include the appropriate units.
Answer: 84.2 amu
Explanation:
Mass of isotope 1 = 77.9
% abundance of isotope 1 = 14.4% = 
Mass of isotope 2 = 81.9
% abundance of isotope 2 = 14.3% = 
Mass of isotope 3 = 85.9
% abundance of isotope 2 = 71.3% = 
Formula used for average atomic mass of an element :
![A=\sum[(77.9\times 0.144)+(81.9\times 0.143)+(85.9\times 0.713)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3D%5Csum%5B%2877.9%5Ctimes%200.144%29%2B%2881.9%5Ctimes%200.143%29%2B%2885.9%5Ctimes%200.713%29%5D)
Therefore, the average atomic mass of a hypothetical element that consists isotopes in the indicated natural abundances is 84.2 amu
Answer: I think the answer is C. NaCl and H2O
Explanation: I’m not sure tho
D. level of the water table
hope its helps
<span>"too much water can cause raging floods and flush pollutants and soil into rivers and streams"
</span>the statement i got the answer from
Its me and me= me.serdtghmjhgfdsaazSDFGHYYUJYHGFDSXAZSDFGHYUJIKUJYHGTFDSXAZSXDCFGHJIKUJHGGFVCDXZVFGHYU7GBFVC CVFGTY67YTGFVC VFGTY56YTGBV VBG
