Answer:
The correct answer is 187.7 J/Jg.
Explanation:
The formula for finding the specific heat of fusion is,
Specific heat of fusion = Q/m
Here Q is the heat energy added, signified in kJ, and m is the mass of the object in kg.
Based on the given information, the heat energy added or Q is 869 kJ and the mass of the ice is 4.6 Kg
Now putting the values in the formula we get,
Specific heat of fusion = Q/m
Specific heat of fusion = 863 kJ / 4.6 Kg = 187.7 J/Kg
The volume of a gas that its pressure increase to 3.4 atm is calculated as follows
By use of boyles law that is P1V1=P2V2
V1=4.0 L
P1=1.1 atm
P2=3.4 atm
V2= P1V1/P2
(1.1 atm x 4.0 L)/3.4 atm= 1.29 L
CrO and Cr₂O₃ make up the simplest chromium oxide formula.
What name does Cr₂O₃ use?
- Chromium oxide (Cr₂O₃)sometimes referred to as chromium sesquioxide or chromic oxide, is a compound in which chromium is oxidized to a +3 state. Sodium dichromate is calcined with either carbon or sulfur to produce it.
- Eskolaite, a mineral that bears the name of the Finnish geologist Pentti Eskola, is a kind of chromium oxide green that may be found in nature. The metallic glassy green surface of this unusual material has an unsettling moss-like look that may be used to conceal oneself in the environment.
- Studies on humans have conclusively shown that chromium (VI) breathed is a potential carcinogen, increasing the likelihood of developing lung cancer. According to animal studies, chromium (VI) exposure by inhalation can result in lung cancers.
Learn more about chromium here:
brainly.com/question/15588080
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Scientific laws or laws of science are statements, based on repeated experiments or observations, that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena.[1] The term law has diverse usage in many cases (approximate, accurate, broad, or narrow) across all fields of natural science (physics, chemistry, astronomy, geoscience, biology). Laws are developed from data and can be further developed through mathematics; in all cases they are directly or indirectly based on empirical evidence. It is generally understood that they implicitly reflect, though they do not explicitly assert, causal relationships fundamental to reality, and are discovered rather than invented.[2]