Answer:
a.
1. NO2(g): Reactant.
2. CO(g): Reactant.
3. NO3(g): Intermediate.
4. CO2(g): Product.
5. NO(g): Product.
b. See attached picture.
Explanation:
Hello,
a. In this case, given the reactions, we can identify each species as:
1. NO2(g): Reactant because it remains at the left side in the overall reaction.
2. CO(g): Reactant because it remains at the left side in the overall reaction.
3. NO3(g): Intermediate because it is a product in the step 1 and a reactant in step 2, for that reason it is not present in the overall reaction.
4. CO2(g): Product because it remains at the right side in the overall reaction.
5. NO(g): Product because it remains at the right side in the overall reaction.
b. In this case, given that the first step is slow and endothermic, it has a high activation energy and the products will have more energy than the reactants, for that reason the final energy is above the initial point. Moreover, since the second step is fast and exothermic, it has a low activation energy and the products will have less energy than the reactants, for that reason, the reaction coordinate diagram is shown on the attached file.
Regards.
Hello
So the molar mass of a Hydrogen molecule is 2. If you have 10 grams of Hydrogen molecules, you have 5 moles<span> of Hydrogen molecules (10 moles of Hydrogen atoms). Avogadro's number is 6.0225x10^23. This means that </span>one mole<span> of a substance has that many particles.
</span>
Have a nice day
Answer: Option D is correct.
Explanation: Equation given by de Broglie is:
where, 
= wavelength of the particle
h = Planck's constant
m = mass of the particle
v = velocity of the particle
In option A, football will have some mass and is moving with a velocity of 25 m/s, hence it will have some wavelength.
In Option B, unladen swallow also have some mass and is moving with a velocity of 38 km/hr, hence it will also have some wavelength.
In Option C, a person has some mass and is running with a velocity of 7 m/hr, hence it will also have some wavelength.
As, the momentum of these particles are large, therefore the wavelength will be of small magnitude and hence, is not observable.
From the above, it is clearly visible that all the options are having some wavelength, so option D is correct.
17.6667 Feet is the answer.
I would say C is the most correct.
In D it depends on what water source you're using. Let's say it is a waterfall, then the source of the water (melting ice or a lake) may disappear in the future.
If you're using underwater "windmills" placed in the ocean, then you would expect it to last a while as the ocean will not disappear in the near future.
