they are not congruent because
the sides, and noncongruent means “not congruent,” that is, not the same shape. (Shapes that are reflected and rotated and translated copies of each other are congruent shapes.) So we want triangles that look fundamentally different. But this is just a congruent copy of the triangle we have up above on the left. is the correct answer
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 52 cards in a standard deck, and there are 4 suits for each card. Therefore there are 4 twos and 4 tens.
At first we have 52 cards to choose from, and we need to get 1 of the 4 twos, therefore the probability is just
After we've chosen a two, we need to choose one of the 4 tens. But remember that we're now choosing out of a deck of just 51 cards, since one card was removed. Therefore the probability is
Now to get the total probability we need to multiply the two probabilities together
The square root rounded up to the nearest integer, 6.
testing the values 1 through 6 for division into 36 we find factors of 36 which are : (1, 36)
(2, 18)
(3, 12)
(4, 9)
(6,6)
or in other words the sets would be : 1, 2 , 3, 4 , 6 , 9 , 12 , 18 , 36
A rational number is<em> a number which can be written a ratio of two integers</em>.
In decimal form, a rational number is any number which either <em>terminates </em>or <em>repeats</em> after the decimal point. Since -1.987 terminates after the 7, it <em>is</em> a rational number.
There are 4 red slices out of 9 total. So there are 9-4 = 5 slices that are not red. The odds in favor of landing on red is 4:5
We basically write the number of ways to get what we want (4), followed by a colon, then the second number is the number of ways to get what we don't want (anything but red; 5 ways)
So that's why the answer is 4:5
-----------------------------------
Side Note -- If we want the odds against, we simply flip the ratio. The odds against would be 5:4 because there are 5 ways to lose and 4 ways to win. This is assuming that landing on red means you win.
