Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Magnification of Microscope is
Mo= Magnification of objective lens and
Me= magnification of the eyepiece.
Both magnifications( of objective and eyepiece) are inversely proportional to the focal length.
Magnification,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d614/4d61428ed8ad66d050cbb141fd67a7604d020d52" alt="M \propto \dfrac{1}{f}"
when the focal length is less magnification will be high and when the magnification is the low focal length of the microscope will be more.
Thus. Magnification will increase by decreasing the focal length.
The correct answer is Option B
The value of the force, F₀, at equilibrium is equal to the horizontal
component of the tension in string 2.
Response:
- The value of F₀ so that string 1 remains vertical is approximately <u>0.377·M·g</u>
<h3>How can the equilibrium of forces be used to find the value of F₀?</h3>
Given:
The weight of the rod = The sum of the vertical forces in the strings
Therefore;
M·g = T₂·cos(37°) + T₁
The weight of the rod is at the middle.
Taking moment about point (2) gives;
M·g × L = T₁ × 2·L
Therefore;
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3b8f/a3b8f5e668df5c0327a29548be4ecda37ef55df5" alt="T_1 = \mathbf{\dfrac{M \cdot g}{2}}"
Which gives;
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4f7d/f4f7d8bd94b4b9ad5f58e24dffd07f47db08e176" alt="M \cdot g = \mathbf{T_2 \cdot cos(37 ^{\circ})+ \dfrac{M \cdot g}{2}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/582c2/582c2cde6cd3432726acdd1fde0b7e27c967fcc8" alt="T_2 = \dfrac{M \cdot g - \dfrac{M \cdot g}{2}}{cos(37 ^{\circ})} = \mathbf{\dfrac{M \cdot g}{2 \cdot cos(37 ^{\circ})}}}"
F₀ = T₂·sin(37°)
Which gives;
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f03f6/f03f6c43a34af27d8d4a8d06c446b8e340293a38" alt="F_0 = \dfrac{M \cdot g \cdot sin(37 ^{\circ})}{2 \cdot cos(37 ^{\circ})}} = \dfrac{M \cdot g \cdot tan(37 ^{\circ})}{2} \approx \mathbf{0.377 \cdot M \cdot g}"
<u />
Learn more about equilibrium of forces here:
brainly.com/question/6995192
The answer is 789.25 which you’d subtract 2011.25-122.2 I think sry if I’m wrong
Answer:
even if it all could be used, it wouldn't be enough
Explanation:
The land area of the US is about 5.45% of the world's area, so the amount of released heat over the area of the US is on the order of 2.4 Tw. Current technology for converting geothermal energy to electricity is about 12% efficient, so the available energy might amount to 0.29 Tw if it could all be captured.
Energy consumption in the US in 2019 was on the order of 0.46 Tw. This suggests that even if <em>all</em> of the thermal energy radiated by the Earth from the US could be turned to useful forms of energy, it would meet only about 60% of the US need for energy.